"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools" - Romans 1:22

[gaelic cowboy]

And what does your data prove? That arctic sea ice was receding and is now coming back? What does that prove? It says nothing to address the fact that their predictions completely failed because they do not understand the underlying causes of the changes they are measuring. No one is arguing that climate change does not exist. It has and always will - even if humans cease to exist entirely. The point is that these people are claiming they know the causes for it and the way are the major factor contributing to it (mainly through our release of greenhouse gases). Considering that we continue to release more and more greenhouse gases, shouldn't the trends they are predicting be getting worse, not better? Also, if they really do understand the science of what causes this, and really can predict what will happen (as they claim they can. In fact, the arguments of leftist politicians and those who support their 'green' policies are based on these predictions), then why are they always so wrong? The fact is that either they do not truly understand the causes for these changes, or they are just being dishonest (or a mix of the both). For all we know, what happens below the earth's surface and on the sun has more to do with climate change than anything that happens on the surface of the earth.

No it does not say Arctic ice is coming back in fact it proves the opposite.

all your proving is that you dont know how to read the graph I gave you.

You have taken one yr and built a thread around it Vuk when in fact we need 7 more yrs of data before we even have an average for this decade.

The reality is there will always be statistical outliers in any graph but the overall trend is always the same.