"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools" - Romans 1:22

[HoreTore]

/facepalm/

It's an honest question, not an accusation or anything like that, IA.

The aim and (debatable) effect of a tax, in this case a carbon tax, is to reduce consumption in the market economy and usually increase consumption in government.

Given Myth's previous posts, I had the impression that he considers consumption in the market economy as bad, thus I would think a tax reducing that kind of consumption to be right up his alley. This works the same whether or not climate change is true, since the tax will lower consumption anyway.