Twitter's Legal&Local Responsibilities

[LeftEyeNine]

Any entity, be it a person or an organization, is required to obey the law. If the law gets changed, they are still required to obey it. Courts don't consider "the law was different when I started my business" as a valid excuse.

Don't confuse legality and justice/fairness. In a free society, law aspires to be just and fair (although it never quite reaches that point). If the parliament of a country passes a law that states any person who walks the street after 9 PM will be shot, and tomorrow a police officer shoots a man for doing it, courts will find nothing illegal happened.

In that case, your beef is with the legislative, not with the judiciary. Courts only care about how a law is enforced, not what it says.

Long story short - remove Erdogan. The fault lies with him, not with courts.

Nope, new laws don't work backwards.

Discerning legality and fairness is not news. We must already be discussing under the assumption that "power" and "right" are not necessarily mutually inclusive.

About your preference of treatment - ...*daydreams*