Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: casualty rates in revolutionary war

  1. #1
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004

    Default casualty rates in revolutionary war

    I was checking some wiki pages about the revolutionary war (after watching

    and the casualty reports seem very low, definitely compared to wars that broke out a few decades later. I've noticed that this seems to be the case for alot of wars fought in the late 17th and 18th century, atleast in the americas. Were weapons so innacurate at that time?

    My first thought was that this is because weapon technology increased dramatically within that time. But that seems not to be the case since battles fought during the french revolution also had low casualties, while the napoleonic wars had alot higher casualty rate. Same for the american civil war.

    a few examples:

    casualties are around like 1%

    compare this to earlier or later wars:

    casualties are more around 10% or upwards (depending on which side ur on XD)

    We do not sow.

  2. #2
    Needs more flowers Moderator drone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Moral High Grounds

    Default Re: casualty rates in revolutionary war

    Most of the battles were skirmishes, so there were fewer "stand in formation and volley fire each other til one runs" fights, the force sizes were smaller and the logistics were tougher. But even the big fights had very few casualties (Yorktown for instance). My guess is that most commanders weren't keen on attrition, since heavy losses on both sides would be difficult to replace, so they were more open to retreating or surrendering when the battlefield situation went south.
    The .Org's MTW Reference Guide Wiki - now taking comments, corrections, suggestions, and submissions

    If I werent playing games Id be killing small animals at a higher rate than I am now - SFTS
    Si je n'étais pas jouer à des jeux que je serais mort de petits animaux à un taux plus élevé que je suis maintenant - Louis VI The Fat

    "Why do you hate the extremely limited Spartan version of freedom?" - Lemur

    Member thankful for this post:

  3. #3
    Clan Takiyama Senior Member CBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002

    Default Re: casualty rates in revolutionary war

    At Trenton the losing side was totally unprepared and was overwhelmed quickly, Millstone was a small skirmish and Fort Washington was superior numbers running over the outposts and leaving the enemy no chance but to surrender. Only Valmy can be classed as a set-piece battle but the German commander had no real reason to keep on attacking in a situation that was too uncertain: Hier schlagen wir nicht

    Obviously there are other examples of low casualty battles but some counter examples would be 18th century battles like Blenheim, Kunersdorf, Torgau and others.

    Technology has little to do with it and it is more a combination of terrain, generalship and what was at stake.

    Member thankful for this post:

  4. #4
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    The EUSSR

    Default Re: casualty rates in revolutionary war

    A change of mindset, a total war is an exchange of casualties, it wasn't fought like that. It was more about making sure the enemy was sure they couldn't possibly win. Hence the low casualty rate. They made up for that in the civil-war though, nasty


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO