Please - roll forth with the anti-Roman quotes.
Jesus suffered the standard punishment for those who disturbed the Pax Romana. In his case he did that by "stirring up trouble" but most of the trouble he stirred up was with his opponents. Remember, Romans were want to issue summary executions to all gentiles who threatened the peace - Crucifixion ceased to be a punishment exclusively for rebels and increasingly it became the standard punishment for non-Romans, later replaced by hanging which became the standard punishment for everyone in the middle ages.Not saying he was guilty. He suffered the same fate that's specifically designed for insurrectionists like I said already. I keep repeating this because it's not wrong and you still haven't said anything that invalidates it. How was he "pro-Roman" anyway..?
No, I didn't - I also didn't miss all the raids against people he thought were going to steal his camels.We were referring to the Qur'an. There's more to the Rashidun caliphate, and it is wrong to assume that they followed in his footsteps considering their quarrels and huge departure from his style of governance.
Nothing. Did you miss the story where the hometown crowd flung shit at him en masse after declaring prophethood?
Actually, I'm pretty sure he's referring to Caananites specifically whom the Israelites colloquially called dogs. You can see this episode and the parable of the Good Samaritan as episodes of racism if you wish but in both cases Jesus uses the episodes to subvert the Jewish idea of exclusive access to God as his "chosen people".I'm pretty sure it's all non-Jews. It's quite clear in the Gospel that Jesus was preaching to his own people and nobody else.
If you read the Gospels Jesus says several times that his ministry is a sort of performance, he's creating his story to contain his message.
Bookmarks