Re: regarding the cliffton thread that got locked
Crisis averted... as the thread has now been locked, there is no danger of any further derailment. All is good, we can now all get back to doing nothing at all...Originally Posted by Ludens
What was there to "deal with"? Who was harmed? What kind of imaginary rules are being broken?
You said the posts were "offtopic", I've said that offtopic used to go on, within the flow of threads and was never a problem. That's all I've said.
Whether the offtopic "discussion" in question within the thread counted as "objectionable" is a different matter.
Only two members were really involved in that exchange, I had not reported the thread or any posts within in it and neither had the other to my knowledge - if he had that would be rather bizarre and hypocritical.
The end result and this show, is worse that the disagreement within the thread. That's the point I'm making and what you fail to recognise.
That mostly constructive thread is locked. In locking that thread apparently you feel you've done a good thing.
So, trolling iron man rules threads get them locked and a helpful and willing moderator aids and abets the trolls by applying the lock...
To replace it we now have this. Even more visible, even more stupid and pointless, presented for the "entertainment" of the entire forum, rather than just the few members involved in the niche sub forum...
In the quest for some kind of misguided, perverted "impartiality", the mods will of course simply blame all those involved - schoolteacher style... which is why we now have this thread in this forum as part of some idiotic formal(?) process which will achieve precisely nothing and may as well be closed. Honestly, no idea why this is here and open and the actual thread with the content in the forum where this is supposed to be is closed...
And what a disaster that would be...
I've seen worse in the backroom. That's how hypocritical and one sided this farce is.
The backroom has a history of more moderator coverage, more moderator time, more bans, infractions, "exchanges", major incidents... than the rest of the site put together. Yet it was all worth it, all perfectly acceptable, permissible and allowed to continue, with minor slaps when some miscreant took things a bit too far. Now we have a minor back and forth between two or three members in a forum which has had no posts this year, apart from that thread... and the resident moderator jumps in.
Playing right into the hands of the individual(s) who resurrected and trolled the old thread and the individual who also felt the need to weigh in and resume spewing bile into the new thread, based on one tiny comment which was perceived as a slight. The fact they were reading at all, the fact they they scanned for any kind of perceived offence says a lot...
Why would you post in an "iron man rules" thread just to trash every idea presented [by the posters you happen to despise]?
Shall I go to the forums about the newer games just to trash every aspect and facet of those? Better still, shall I also post in the threads relating to certain MTW mods and just trash and ridicule those mods, their implementations and the individuals involved?
It's win, win for me... based on this, the worst scenario is that the threads will be locked...
That's the easy part, but difficult for some it would seem. But it's not worth the effort, lumping everyone together, etc, is the more "professional" way of doing things... and calling it a "feud" is also rather telling... just lock those threads and treat ALL those deemed to be involved as idiots - impartially and equally...
Bookmarks