Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: developing a game after it goes gold

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Needs more flowers Moderator drone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Moral High Grounds
    Posts
    9,287

    Post Re: developing a game after it goes gold

    Regarding EA and their studios, I think the situation can get even worse than fret says, since they have to deal with console games as well as PC. Burn those console discs, and pray there are no show-stopper bugs. Vodka, with a milk of magnesium chaser, keep them coming until closing time, be here same time tomorrow...
    The .Org's MTW Reference Guide Wiki - now taking comments, corrections, suggestions, and submissions

    If I werent playing games Id be killing small animals at a higher rate than I am now - SFTS
    Si je n'étais pas jouer à des jeux que je serais mort de petits animaux à un taux plus élevé que je suis maintenant - Louis VI The Fat

    "Why do you hate the extremely limited Spartan version of freedom?" - Lemur

  2. #2

    Default Re: developing a game after it goes gold

    Quote Originally Posted by drone
    since they have to deal with console games as well as PC. Burn those console discs
    This is a very real problem, however, because console development is done on proprietry hardware, the occurance of such show-stopping bugs is a much rarer occurance than in the PC market, which has to cope with an infinate number of combinations of hardware manufacturers and a myriad of varying client specifications.

    A 'rushed' console game is more likely to result in a less polished title, rather than a title needing emergency patches.


    With regard to gauranteed franchise success and the mega succesful studio's, such a id, Bioware, Valve, Firaxis etc, the draconian measure's forced on them by the publishers still remain, the differance is that the Studio will be able to negotiate a better SPA in the first place - but if they fail to meet the the terms they still get punished the same as the little guys. ie when Firaxis negotiated the Civ3 SPA, they would have bargained for a longer development period mainly, if Joe Bloggs Studio wanted to develop a title, Activision would give them less capital and less time to create the product, wheras id or Firaxis would get more capital funding and a longer deveopment period.

    Still, there are very, very, very few people who can arrogantly have the attitude of John Carmack and tell the Activision big-wigs "It will be ready when its ready".

    Another consideration with these mega-succesful companies is that much of the work will be contracted out anyway (for example, id never made Return to Castle Wolfenstien, they merely oversaw the development of it in a consultative capacity) in this case, the publisher still has to enforce a draconian regime which is passed down the chain.. Activision pressure id -> id pressure contractor -> and so on.

    Ad naseum hell on earth

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO