EU yes or no?

[Rodion Romanovich]

- It is headed by a democrathic Parilament

Lies and deceit, the parliament has no official power. Those who do have power, are not democratically elected. In fact, all the Parliament are allowed to do is TALK.

- It obtains an equal and united Citizenship for its people

This Citizenship only exists by name. And people don't want to be united like that, people want to preserve their own culture.

- Freedom of moval and trade

If you have the wrong skin color, you'll still be harassed at all borders. Freedom of movement is not necessary unless their oppression in your home country. Free trade can be achieved without a dictatorship political union.

- common laws

We don't want that. The fact that I still live in my home country is because I like it's laws. Nothing could be worse than applying the laws of other countries to my country. Our laws won't be spread to the other nations, we'll be forced to use theirs. And why would we even want to spread our own laws? All countries have the right to have their own law and culture and should be respected.

The Nationalist Wing can of course not accept that their Nation is accepting a higher authority. Its just about that someone pulled Nationalism on the Altar of pray, must view this as a kind of hereticism.

What is the difference between Nationalism with a small country and Nationalism with a large union-country without democratic leadership? Answer: the union-country without democratic leadership is undemocratic and people can no longer preserve their own laws, culture and freedom.

The failure to respect people's need for freedom and preserving of their own culture and law will result in rebellions and civil war, which I'll personally take part in when they've grown sufficiently large.