Unfortunately, it is not sanity that is prevailing in Kansas, but lies and deceit.

The fanatic darwinists falsely said that the Kansas School board opposed evolution.

In reality, they only supported teaching that there are some criticisms of evolution:
http://www.ksde.org/outcomes/sciencestd.html
(go to 8th-12th grade standards).

At the top of page 18, dealing with life sciences:
STANDARD 3: LIFE SCIENCE GRADES 8-12

LIFE SCIENCE – The student will develop an understanding of the cell, molecular basis of heredity, biological evolution, interdependence of organisms, matter, energy, and organization in living systems, and the behavior of organisms.

Benchmark 3: The student will understand the major concepts of the theory of biological evolution.
At the end of the section (page 21).
The life science standards provide a framework for a variety of courses in the life sciences. Evolution is a key theoretical framework for the life sciences; these indicators should be part of any life science course curriculum, including biology, botany, zoology, and microbiology.
The part that apparently got the darwinists hot in their tweed (page 20):
7. explains proposed scientific explanations of the origin of life as well as scientific criticisms of those explanations.

7. Some of the scientific criticisms include:
a A lack of empirical evidence for a “primordial soup” or a chemically hospitable pre-biotic atmosphere;
b. The lack of adequate natural explanations for the genetic code, the sequences of genetic information necessary to specify life, the biochemical machinery needed to translate genetic information into functional biosystems, and the formation of proto-cells; and
c. The sudden rather than gradual emergence of organisms near the time that the Earth first became habitable.
All of the standards are not compatible at all with creationism, and make no mention of Intelligent design.

The darwinists, refusing to acknowledge that there could be some small holes in Darwin's theory, labeled them 'anti-science' among other lies. And I guess for the 'New Scientist' and others in the media using the facts instead of hype is too much work.

A National Review article on the subject:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q...E3MWM0Y2ZkOGI=

Crazed Rabbit