Quote Originally Posted by Don Corleone
Honestly, I don't care how fictional it is. It's sick and demented. 'Creating' child pornography using Photoshop is still pornography and writing about fathers giving their young sons hummers is sick, twisted fantasy.
Perhaps it is, but the difference is that nobody got hurt when this guy put his words on a page; and the same can not be said of Foley. (Get it? What a clever pun. I'm very proud of that one!)

Quote Originally Posted by Don Corleone
Honestly, I don't care how fictional it is. It's sick and demented. 'Creating' child pornography using Photoshop is still pornography and writing about fathers giving their young sons hummers is sick, twisted fantasy. I'll resist the popular theme of comparing this to the Foley case, as that had ramifications of abuse of power and sexual harrassment. This on the other hand is truly pedophilia, as at least Foley's pages were of the age of consent in most states.
C'mon Don, your really reaching there. If somebody writing about fictional man/boy sex is guilty of pedophilia, does that mean somebody writing about a serial killer is guilty of murder?