Explicit Writing Democrat Scandal

[Don Corleone]

The act described in the book is pedophilia. No, that doesn't make Webb a pedophile, Goof, but 'artistic license' doesn't change the fact that the author chose to describe a pedophilic sexual act in a positive, or at worst morally neutral light.

As for "where's the harm" (for you BG), pedophiles seek out examples in pornography and literature to titliate them, yes, but also to seek reassurance that their desires are healthy and natural. This author chose to give them just that. So pedophiles sit around reading his book thinking "gee, I didn't do anything all that bad. It's natural what I did to that boy last week, and I shouldn't worry about trying it again". Yeah, who gets hurt?

Edit: Thanks Lemur, yes Goofy and I forgot to mention, yes, truly clever pun. Well done.