I believe the person in the text was refered to as a "young son" and a "boy" which leads me to believe he was far younger than the age of consent in any civilized society.Prince, btw, who are you to judge this man. If two homosexual guys, 16 years old, have sex, isn't that consenting? Are you discreminating against youths now? Strange how you can get all pissed when someone discusses your sexual orientation but yet you call someone that has a different preferance than yours, they're "sick". Judge not lest ye be judged.
So:
has little to do with the discussion, as the text did not describe such a situation.If two homosexual guys, 16 years old, have sex, isn't that consenting? Are you discreminating against youths now?
Bookmarks