Quote Originally Posted by Vuk
If that wasn't the most pathetic, dancing-around-the-bush-lameasshat-nobrain statement I have ever heard!!!!
My pleasure.
Quote Originally Posted by Vuk
The Constitution is the basis and foundation of this land! 'SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND', need I quote it? It is revolutionary to say that it isn't (look up the word revolution on dictionary.com, and you'll see)!!
I have never 'silently avoided' the constitution in any debate (even though there are parts of it I personally disagree with); If you have a problem, amend it!
It does declare itself as the ultimate legal authority of the United States -- I never disputed that. By the way, it isn't "revolutionary" to disagree; even if I don't, in any case.
Quote Originally Posted by Vuk
That is not a vague amendment! It is clearly stated to avoid any confusion or interpretation: , 'The right to keep and bear arms'! Need it be any simpler my little leftist friend?
The right to keep and bear arms is SECURED in the constitution! The only reason people can't in some places is because of the UNCONSTITUTIONAL practice of 'Selective Incorparation'!
Second Amendment to the United States Constitution:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

A prime example of terrible sentence construction up there; somehow I suspect it's intentional, though.

Tell me, word-for-word, phrase-for-phrase, what do they mean. Don't just summarize the whole, either. This is legalese, not basic "understanding" English.

I'll readily present alternative viewpoints and their justifications of your awaited interpretation of the phrase.
Quote Originally Posted by Vuk
As for Switzerland, no, I think its the colour undies they wear [expletive]! (Of course the countries around them have a similar culture, enviorment, form of government, and, hey! Wear the same UNDIES!!
That makes...no sense.