We don't have pets in our home. We have a family of companion animals. What is the rationale of your position? What would you offer as a resolution to the negative consequences of not having any means of population control for these animals? They are not able to consider these consequences themselves, let alone resolve them. That's our responsibility. Really, this is quite serious.
Companion animals have the right to a comfortable, dignified, quality life and it is our responsibility to provide that. You use the expression "wipe out." Do you believe spaying/neutering is some form of passive biocide/genocide? If so, consider the active extermination of those poor animals who have spent their last hours of life pressed against the cage doors waiting for some one to take them to a home and care for them.
Who is to blame for that? If you want a really poignant answer, ask those who are in the position of having to deal with this miserable situation on a routine basis. The grief they feel provides them with a ready answer, I'll tell you that! Please reconsider your position, Carrot. If you can't, then you and others who oppose spaying/neutering: Get busy and find all these innocent victims a home!
Re: Hunters are 'serial killers'.
Originally Posted by doc_bean
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks