It's not a case of preventing such freak accidents but rather making sure no one can sue the manufacturers the 'tools-of-mayhem'. If it wasn't possible in (for the most part anglo-saxon countries) to sue for the most ridiculous reasons and amounts and still win, this phenomenon wouldn't exist.Originally Posted by TB666
To award damages, the legal system should determine who is to blame right. In such stupid cases as these, the consumer (a.k.a. mr/mrs. retard) would carry the blame for the most part if not entirely. So why should (s)he get damages in such a huge amount?
If only we would live in a logical society, damages would only be granted when accidents happen during normal use (or what would be considered widespread use) of an object. So labels would have an informational value rather than legal protection for the manufacturer.
Bookmarks