Or with their Bibles?

Good article about Giuliani's prospective candidacy:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16814054/

Quote Originally Posted by The Article
But first he has to capture the GOP nomination - and the big question is whether he can win over enough Republicans in states like Iowa and South Carolina, among the first nominating contests where voters are solid conservatives and could be turned off by his stance on social issues.
"Giuliani is going to have to convince people that he's more conservative than his record otherwise would suggest," said Peverill Squire, who teaches politics at the University of Iowa.
The former mayor's support for abortion rights, gay rights and gun control conflict with the hard-line positions of the GOP's right. His supporters say he's not as liberal on those issues as he's made out to be. Still, he's from New York - and that alone rankles the party's conservative wing.
Despite that, Giuliani's backers contend - and some Republican strategists agree - that he could get support from fiscal conservatives because of his record of cutting taxes, curbing spending and promoting small government, particularly now when the base is smarting over the soaring federal deficit under Republicans.
Seems to me that Rudy embodies traditional (and worthwhile) Republican values such as small government and low taxes, but falls flat only on the superficial issues that the Republicans have recently embraced in order to win over the religious right.

Now, I know that many on the right would say that abortion is hardly a superficial issue, but I ask you: Do you really think that the next Republican President will somehow be able to abolish abortion?

The answer can only be a resounding "No."

So why not nominate a guy that's good on everything else, when the abortion issue is something he won't be able to change no matter what his views are?

So, which way will it go when it comes nomination time?