Quote Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost
Shoot the messenger, Vlad?

Anyway, perhaps by now you have read my second post:

It's not (in the main) the Shia militias that are killing American troops.
Quote Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost
Shoot the messenger, Vlad?

Anyway, perhaps by now you have read my second post:



It's not (in the main) the Shia militias that are killing American troops.
No, it's that you launched into a crude attack, citing a biased source, didn't check your facts, and are ignoring history. Besides, is it a numbers game with you? “In the main”? The article, and these weapons, focus on hard targets (armor) and not open air markets. You’re suggesting that because the death toll isn’t high enough that it’s not important.

Either you didn’t read the article of you merely skimmed over it just to reinforce some malevolent, preconceived notion. Do you expect us to believe that you don’t know the difference between Shia and Sunni? I suppose you’re proud of your fine English heritage then.

Fantasy-mongers? Uninformed and trite. I suppose many of the soldiers patrolling Baghdad are also fantasy mongers. If you were paying attention this issue or had done your research you’d know that this has been going on for a while. If you also knew your history on the “fabricated” intelligence, you’d know that it’s the same evidence used and vetted around the world and, yes, confirmed by members of the opposition party here (to include the previous administration). Gotcha politics are cheap and this is a large, seperate subject.

Trust me, there are plenty of other things that this administration deserves to be lampooned on, but this has wrong written all over it.

Crude, uninformed, and trite. Before you take offense consider this as a sign of respect and yourself as a mortally wounded victim of your own success. It’s like you’re trying to fence while high on PCP . My God, I was so traumatized that I had to read it three times to make sure I wasn't the one on drugs.