Conrad Salier:
This is, erm, unfortunate.
Chancellor Leopold's actions are quite lamentable and his motive is clouded. It seems as if he is deliberately harming the Crusade, which is a most unholy and dishonorable act.
However, that said, there is no provision in any of the edicts that states that the Crusaders will retain full control over their armies, or that they are to be treated as if they were House Armies. Therefore, the Chancellor has not technically violated an edict.
Perhaps, if an Emergency Session were to be called, it would serve better to reprimand him and place legislation in place that would prevent future occurances such as these rather than impeach him.
That said, I vehemently disagree with his acts, although it is on a personal level rather than a legal one.
Bookmarks