Quote Originally Posted by Marshal Murat
It's the number replaced by Clinton that is insane.

The prosecutions the attorneys are trying to work on are ones that involve voter fraud that they don't want to reveal.

I think the article states that the prosecutors weren't doing their job, and for that they should be sacked.
Take sacked U.S. Attorney John McKay from Washington state. In 2004, the Governor's race was decided in favor of Democrat Christine Gregoire by 129 votes on a third recount. As the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and other media outlets reported, some of the "voters" were deceased, others were registered in storage-rental facilities, and still others were convicted felons. More than 100 ballots were "discovered" in a Seattle warehouse. None of this constitutes proof that the election was stolen. But it should have been enough to prompt Mr. McKay, a Democrat, to investigate, something he declined to do, apparently on grounds that he had better things to do.
Sorry, but you just proved my point. The Republicans sacked this guy because he wouldn't open an investigation against Democrats that the Republicans wanted open. And I bet you dollars to donuts that if the Washington election had gone the other way and the Republicans won by 100 votes, they would have sacked the guy if he did open an investication.