Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
![]()
I'm glad we got to the bottom of that. I think now that we can safely say:
Guns don't kill people.
Immigrants kill people.
I'm calling the NRA right now to order my new bumper sticker.
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
![]()
I'm glad we got to the bottom of that. I think now that we can safely say:
Guns don't kill people.
Immigrants kill people.
I'm calling the NRA right now to order my new bumper sticker.
Last edited by Goofball; 04-17-2007 at 17:08.
"What, have Canadians run out of guns to steal from other Canadians and now need to piss all over our glee?"
- TSM
No, it's BS. Hobbyist rocket builders are having a harder time getting material for their small rockets because of increased regulations on explosives.One can buy any chemicals to build any device of proper inclusion against those they deam inferior, unpatriotic, against their own high values of humanlife (even as they murder them), or for any futuristic imagination that justifies their purchase of WMDs. It is a fact.
Um....sources for those alleged 'facts'? Yea, thought not. Felons have not been able to buy guns for decades, and the GOP did not repeal any gun laws, particularly any that made it 'easier' for felons to get guns.Crime has increased upto 30% in some areas (citys') and more prisons have been built than colleges or schools in general. Why? Because anyone, even a felon has access to a wmd under todays laws of "gun uncontrol".
Sir Moody - if you're trying to argue against my position please use facts, not some hypothetical scenario. I grow tired of gun control advocates making up these hypothetical situations that have no basis in reality. It's silly to think that somehow a student is going to be able to not see the attacking gunman, and will instead attack someone who drew their gun AFTER the shooting had started.
And I think this campus - like most in the US - already has armed police.
I saw a list in Der Speigel of Euro press articles commenting on this, and tought I'd respond to clear some things up for our European friends:
British daily The Independent writes:
Despite the opposition of every police force in the land [not true at all], Congress in 2004 allowed to lapse a 10-year federal ban on semi-automatic assault weapons, a particular favorite of violent criminals [again, not true at all. The weapons banned by this bill accounted for perhaps 1% of all firearms crime. Also, this bill would not have effected this shooting in any way].
The Times of London writes:
The National Rifle Association's (NRA) response is predictable too [a statement of condolence not mentioning gun politics at all, unlike the brady bunch?]. They will point out that events such as this are not carried out by a rifle-wielding member of a weekend militia. There is no doubt that access to rapid-action shotguns makes these events even more destructive but as we have seen with suicide bombers [um...I'll chalk this one up to bad info. But we've had these scary 'rapid action shotguns' for 100+ years, and few sprees use them]Etc, and many other assorted stupid things blaming the NRA, guns, American society.German daily Bild writes:
"Now we will probably begin discussing the overly lax gun laws in the United States. There, buying a machine gun is often easier than getting a driver's license [WTF? Do they do no research? This is completely false].
CR
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
To answer your question: No they do not do any research and if so they often do it very sloppily or just choose to ignore the results of the research (if the results are not dramatic enough).Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
It is not unusual that BILD (often knowingly) reports false "facts" (now that is an oxymoron) (NB there is actually a whole website dedicated to pointing out all the junk that BILD reports - quite funny, too bad that it is only available in German).
BILD is a tabloid newspaper that usually goes for the shock effect - please do not consider it to be exemplary for the German press (although there are unfortunately too many people who use it as an actual source for news, so I am sorry to tell you that a number of Germans will actually form their opinions based on what this "newspaper" writes)
End of rant![]()
Wellllll.....Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
The blame for incidents like this pretty much has to fall on some combination including one or more of those factors, n'est-ce pas?
"What, have Canadians run out of guns to steal from other Canadians and now need to piss all over our glee?"
- TSM
Just to clarify: the ban also included magazines holding more than 10 bullets. We don't know the details here, but most 9mm pistols are designed for 15+. Probably wouldn't have helped much here though (and you could always buy pre-ban mags).Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
The laws in this country are fine, the enforcement is the problem.
The .Org's MTW Reference Guide Wiki - now taking comments, corrections, suggestions, and submissions
If I werent playing games Id be killing small animals at a higher rate than I am now - SFTS
Si je n'étais pas jouer à des jeux que je serais mort de petits animaux à un taux plus élevé que je suis maintenant - Louis VI The Fat
"Why do you hate the extremely limited Spartan version of freedom?" - Lemur
sorry, i apologize. i just discovered the cuteness that is dana perino. i heretofore, forthwith and henceforth delcare today dana perino day and will respond to nothing else unless dana perino can somehow be tied to it.Originally Posted by Adrian II
indeed
That's good to hear, Ser Clegane.
I tend to blame the shooter; he who is responsible for this, he who pulled the triggers.The blame for incidents like this pretty much has to fall on some combination including one or more of those factors, n'est-ce pas?
Now, I think society could help by looking for desperate individuals and trying to help them.
But the greatest (in number of dead) attack upon a school in the US involved, firearm wise, only one rifle bullet. Also, consider that back in the 1950s kids could bring their guns to school for rifle team or hunting after school - there were many more guns in schools, and it wasn't until the gun free zone was passed (early 1990s I believe) that school shootings really took off.
Crazed Rabbit
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
if i had the time to go dig up some facts im sure icould - i dont i was stating my opinion on the matter crazed and im sorry gun nuts really scare me - the only people i want to have a tool purpsofully designed to kill with no other purpose is those whos job it is to protect me ie soldiers and the police and no amount of stat tweaking or carefully balenced "studies" is going to change my opinionSir Moody - if you're trying to argue against my position please use facts, not some hypothetical scenario. I grow tired of gun control advocates making up these hypothetical situations that have no basis in reality. It's silly to think that somehow a student is going to be able to not see the attacking gunman, and will instead attack someone who drew their gun AFTER the shooting had started.
Pro-gun people are just as guilty of this....Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
really? --> there are many plausible scenario's (that one isn't). smoke, noise, panic, especially if the student was disorientated or unused to using a gun, --> when talking of such scenario's there are many variables etc.It's silly to think that somehow a student is going to be able to not see the attacking gunman, and will instead attack someone who drew their gun AFTER the shooting had started.
I agree that scenario's don;t really achieve much when talking of guns, but its equally uncertain either way, ie. a student having a gun may have been able to stop the shooting, but equally a student having a gun could have made it worse... is a bit pointless...![]()
I'm not sure i trust the police with guns....Originally Posted by Sir Moody
Sir Moody, I think you'd realize all us 'gun nuts' in the USA are very nice people. We just enjoy shooting firearms. We're not crazy, we're not unbalanced.
I would hope you don't form an opinion on people you've never met based on sensationalist articles in your press.
And if firearms have only one purpose - to kill people - then almost all of them are defective. But such a tool is what you want if you're being attacked with deadly force, isn't it?
EDIT: Note that the previous 'record' for a school shooting, way back in 1966, was kept lower than it might have been by ordinary citizens shooting back at the killer with their rifles.
CR
Last edited by Crazed Rabbit; 04-17-2007 at 18:01.
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
Japan has different problems; violence among school kids there is autodestructive rather than directed against others, but it is a huge issue.Originally Posted by nokhor
The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott
Originally Posted by Adrian II
--> its very much a problem in japan
And now, for some more perspective, here is a view from the World Socialist Web Site written after the Columbine shooting.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott
Gah...some more news:
Also, this bit brought a tear to my eye:BLACKSBURG, Va. - The gunman suspected of carrying out the Virginia Tech massacre that left 33 people dead was identified Tuesday as a English major whose creative writing was so disturbing that he was referred to the school's counseling service.
Apparently, that teacher was a holocaust survivor.Virginia Tech University Prof. Liviu Librescu, described as a family man who once did research for NASA, sacrificed his life to save his students in the shooting rampage yesterday.
...
Then the gunfire started coming closer. Librescu, 77, fearlessly braced himself against the door, holding it shut against the gunman in the hall, while students darted to the windows of the second-floor classroom to escape the slaughter, survivors said.
Mallalieu and most of his classmates hung out of the windows and dropped about 10 feet to bushes and grass below - but Librescu stayed behind to hold off the crazed gunman.
Oh dear God, what man hath wrought upon ourselves.
CR
Last edited by Crazed Rabbit; 04-17-2007 at 18:16.
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
Ah ...facts ....interesting , so this errrrrr..... "fact" about felons not being able to buy guns , that would be the fact that registered licenced firearms dealers have to do a backround thingy on their customers sort of fact . So rabbit as you are an enthusiastic firearms fan could you enlighten me as to where a criminal could purchase a firearm without having to comply with the backround check ?Um....sources for those alleged 'facts'? Yea, thought not. Felons have not been able to buy guns for decades, and the GOP did not repeal any gun laws, particularly any that made it 'easier' for felons to get guns.
Come to think of it where did those two Columbine nuts buy their guns ?
In case future definitions of Heroism are required, that teacher is by any standards a hero. He gave his life so others might live by concious action.
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
Felons could - not legally - buy from people other than licensed dealers without background checks. But that's the same as it's always been, nothing has changed as Mr. Chobee suggested.
CR
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
What Hitler couldn't do, this Korean guy could. The shooter's family had better make a damn good show of remorse, else I hope the press delves deep into their family life in revenge. If you're not going to say sorry and show that you're sorry, let the press do all they can to show how you've produced this monster of a son.Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
So the family produced this monster? How exactly?Originally Posted by Pannonian
The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott
Yep so legally they cannot go along to an arms fair and buy a weapon from an unlicenced dealer who will not do a backround check , neither can they legally buy a weapon through a classified ad from an individual who is not a licensed dealer and doesn't do a backround check .Felons could - not legally - buy from people other than licensed dealers without background checks. But that's the same as it's always been, nothing has changed as Mr. Chobee suggested.
Its a good thing criminals are very law abiding otherwise it would be ridiculously easy for them to buy guns .
First off, I thought that many Americans pretend to be Christian. Possibly the power of forgiveness?
Then As Adrian rightly mentions: possibly the family might not be aware of what their on was going to do, and you are jumping to conclusions faster than a Tabloid newspaper?
There's a good chance the family have nothing to say sorry for. Oh, and they've also lost a son who has probably done something that they find as horrific as everyone else.
What has Hitler got to do with anything?
Best keep the poisonous rants to yourself, eh?
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
I think CR deserves a cookie, making this a gun debate is pretty pointless, we have had school shootings here in Europe even though guns are banned here.Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
The problem is that students are desperate because they have noone to help them ease their problems, rather there are a lot of people who enjoy putting more weight onto their poor souls, not realizing how destructive they really are.
IMO this has to do with a lack of morals. Older people were always taught to treat others with respect etc, but nowadays morals and respect are constantly vanishing among young kids, they don't even respect the weaker teachers anymore, they're sometimes like carnivores who will bully against everybody who is weaker. a school shooting is like the counterstrike of the weaker people. I just hope I will be able to raise my kids with some morals and a strong mind once I have some and if anyone bullies them I am going to open the gates of my personal hell and bring down whatever is inside upon the ones responsible(I don't really have an idea what that means, but I'm not going to tolerate it, also not if my own kids should start bullying others)
Let me repeat, I was thinking of doing something like this myself many years ago...
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
Better yet, we should shoot the guy's family in retribution.Originally Posted by Pannonian
![]()
"What, have Canadians run out of guns to steal from other Canadians and now need to piss all over our glee?"
- TSM
Page 4 reminder announcement:
Keep it to the topic, not the poster.
Kindly carry on.
Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.
did i say all americans were gun nuts? did i even put a country to my opinion? no i did not.Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
I dont read newspapers and i take any online article with a severe pinch of salt those are MY opinions not some regurgitated rubish taken from someone else
erm crazed do you even read your own posts? "Guns arnt designed to kill things sir - because i said so" guns ARE designed to kill people thats IS their only function - they may not do it in every case but the design is sound
I think the solution is to take things like this more seriously. Even if you miraculously removed all guns from America, someone who goes crazy will still kill people. He may only be able to kill 8 or 9 instead of 32 but that's still a big deal. Explosives would probably be used (as in the worst school killings). Guns are not the issue. We have more school shootings in America because we have more guns, but you can't claim that we have more killers because we have no guns.Professor Carolyn Rude, chairwoman of the university's English department, said she did not personally know the gunman. But she said she spoke with Lucinda Roy, the department's director of creative writing, who had Cho in one of her classes and described him as "troubled."
"There was some concern about him," Rude said. "Sometimes, in creative writing, people reveal things and you never know if it's creative or if they're describing things, if they're imagining things or just how real it might be. But we're all alert to not ignore things like this."
Banning something like violent movies just because they affect psychopaths is irrational.
1764? 1927? The 1927 one is the worst killing. I don't think violent movies had anything to do with anything there.* Enoch Brown school massacre - Franklin County, Pennsylvania, United States; July 26, 1764
* Bath School disaster - Bath, Michigan, United States; May 18, 1927
* Poe Elementary School Attack - Houston, Texas, United States; September 15, 1959
It was my impression that families (Asian ones anyway) are supposed to be responsible for their issue. If they don't hold themselves responsible for him, then let the press do it for them. If there's a screwy family that led to this ill-produced scion, let the press uncover it. If the problems are deeper rooted as in the massively dysfunctional Japanese society, let the press discuss that as well. But this is one of those cases where vengeance and constructive investigation go hand in hand.Originally Posted by rory_20_uk
Sorry about my rather savage post, but the harming of Holocaust survivors is one of the few issues to make me really react - another related one being exploitation of the Holocaust that cheapens its memory.Originally Posted by KukriKhan
He's a South Korean immigrant, not Japanese.Originally Posted by Pannonian
The .Org's MTW Reference Guide Wiki - now taking comments, corrections, suggestions, and submissions
If I werent playing games Id be killing small animals at a higher rate than I am now - SFTS
Si je n'étais pas jouer à des jeux que je serais mort de petits animaux à un taux plus élevé que je suis maintenant - Louis VI The Fat
"Why do you hate the extremely limited Spartan version of freedom?" - Lemur
Congrats, you've highlighted the need for enforcement of our existing laws.Yep so legally they cannot go along to an arms fair and buy a weapon from an unlicenced dealer who will not do a backround check , neither can they legally buy a weapon through a classified ad from an individual who is not a licensed dealer and doesn't do a backround check .
Its a good thing criminals are very law abiding otherwise it would be ridiculously easy for them to buy guns .
Fixed.First off, I thought that many Americans pretend to be are Christian.
Indeed I do, though I wonder if you did:erm crazed do you even read your own posts? "Guns arnt designed to kill things sir - because i said so" guns ARE designed to kill people thats IS their only function - they may not do it in every case but the design is sound
Are you familiar with trap shotguns, hunting shotguns, hunting rifles, target pistols, .22 rifles, and a plethora of others clearly not designed to kill people?And if firearms have only one purpose - to kill people - then almost all of them are defective. But such a tool is what you want if you're being attacked with deadly force, isn't it?
Don't mind if I do:I think CR deserves a cookie,
Crazed Rabbit
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
I was using Japanese society as an example of how the roots may go back further than any individual or family. If the investigations of those various incidents hadn't looked at the family, and at the wider society as a whole, would people be as aware of the depth of the problem?Originally Posted by drone
This guy's family should be looking at themselves and asking how he came to be like this, and the deceased's families deserve to know the answers. The press in its various guises can serve as both carrot and stick with which to find answers to the question "Why?". If the family isn't inclined to go public with the results, IMHO an incident of this kind and severity gives the press the right to look for the answers themselves. And if this is an intrusion into their family's privacy - tough cheese.
Bookmarks