Quote Originally Posted by Stig
Wrong, bandwagoning is voting without a reason
If enough of us are convinced of his quilt no-one is bandwagoning.
Quote Originally Posted by AndresTheCunning
You're right. But it seems like some players call putting a third or fourth vote on somebody, even with an explanation, "bandwagoning".
Erm, actually, he's wrong.

To 'bandwagon' is to join a growing campaign against one person for no good reason apart from the fact that there is already a campaign against them.

If we all just voted without any argument or explanation, the Mafia could more easily use it as an opportunity to hide & to get a free kill. So, to avoid being accused of 'bandwagonning', you should try & give your reasons for why someone should be lynched.

Quote Originally Posted by Andres
Voting for somebody because he is "bandwagoning" is not a good reason in this system. As Sigurd pointed out, a bandwagon is neccessary to obtain a lynching, so you can't put suspicion on a player because he tries helping the town in getting a suspect lynched.
This is wrong too. 'Bandwagoning', as explained above, is voting in a suspicious or unhelpful manner; a well-considered majority verdict is necessary for a lynching - there's a key difference between the two.

It's alright to think somebody's argument is good - you just need to explain why you think it's good.

As BK - noise at the beginning of the game is just noise. I don't think he's our man.