Yes and no. They're not better in a fight than later knights, but then later knights are usually much more expensive for a marginal upgrade, so you get more bang for your feudal buck so to speak.
As for 2 handers and pikes, well, they don't have the same role as knights on the battlefield, so saying "DFKs beat them" is a bit unfair.
2-handers kill *way* more guys on the charge than footknights do, but they don't last as long in a protracted fight, making 2 handers better at flanking, and knights better at holding the line or taking/defending walls.
And pikes... well, pikes are a bit whacky, they insist on closing to sword range instead of pushing everybody back soooo.
Bookmarks