Client Kingdoms: confused by the concept.

[Didz]

About 16 turns ago I got the following Diplomatic Report.

This clearly states that France and the HRE have become client kingdoms.

I'm not sure if this is meant to imply that they are client kingdoms of each other, or one of the other, or that they are both client kingdoms of someone else.

The faction overview shows the HRE as a vassal of Denmark, but makes no mention of France as a vassal of anyone. Not only that but the HRE seems to have its own independant set of allies (Milan, Byzantine, Russia, Denmark, and Hungary) which is quite different to Denmarks (England, Venice and Poland)

On a secondary point: Can anyone confirm what impact vassalage has on Faction Goals and diplomacy, for example, if Scotland were to make England a vassal state would that satisfy their faction goal for the Short Campaign or does elimination mean exactly that, also is is possible to declare war on a vassal without going to war with its protector?

[Eng]

Shouldn't client kingdoms be like the austro-hungarian empire???

[Ciaran]

I'm not sure if this is meant to imply that they are client kingdoms of each other, or one of the other, or that they are both client kingdoms of someone else

The faction overview shows the HRE as a vassal of Denmark, but makes no mention of France as a vassal of anyone. Not only that but the HRE seems to have its own independant set of allies (Milan, Byzantine, Russia, Denmark, and Hungary) which is quite different to Denmarks (England, Venice and Poland)

It should mean that France is a vassal to the HRE. Vassals still can have their own allies and enemies.

On a secondary point: Can anyone confirm what impact vassalage has on Faction Goals and diplomacy, for example, if Scotland were to make England a vassal state would that satisfy their faction goal for the Short Campaign or does elimination mean exactly that, also is is possible to declare war on a vassal without going to war with its protector?

I´ve never tried to make the faction I had to eliminate my vassal, so I can´t answer the first part. The second part, however, is simple: Yes, you can declare war on a faction that´s a vassal to someone else without automatically triggering a war with the overlord. However, the overlord will not like it very much that you attacked his vassal (the same goes for allies, by the way) so expect a drop in your relationship. And if you´re allied with the overlord you´ll most likely lose your alliance, unless you can somehow get the vassal to initiate the war.

[FactionHeir]

You cannot make a shadow faction your vassal. They'll also not sue for peace when beaten down.

Who breaks alliance with who has some random factor but it mainly based on relations. If your relations with the faction is better than the other's for at least 1 turn, chances are it will break alliance with the person you attacked.

[Didz]

It should mean that France is a vassal to the HRE.

In that case there is a definate gliche in my game. As you can see the diplomatic report clearly states France and HRE. But the faction overview shows HRE as a vassal of Denmark.

I'm surprised that vassals can have their own allies and enemies, I would have thought that their overlord would more or less have dictated their foriegn policy. I imagine that could lead to some interesting situations.

Having said that I'm surprised at how little conformance there is between allied factions in the game so it probably related.

Yes, you can declare war on a faction that´s a vassal to someone else without automatically triggering a war with the overlord. However, the overlord will not like it very much that you attacked his vassal (the same goes for allies, by the way) so expect a drop in your relationship.

That doesn't seem any different to declaring war of allies then. So, assuming that the faction overview is the accurate record. I could attack the HRE without automatically triggering a war with Denmark, but presumably if I attacked Denmark I am likely to find that it is calling on the resources (if not the armies) of the HRE for additional support.

You cannot make a shadow faction your vassal. They'll also not sue for peace when beaten down.

I'm not familiar with the term 'shadow faction' but I assume this is some background classification assigned to factions that are pre-set elimination targets for another faction in the short campaign victory conditions e.g. England v France, Scotland v England, Turkey v Byzantine etc.

If your relations with the faction is better than the other's for at least 1 turn, chances are it will break alliance with the person you attacked.

Interesting, so on that basis then, if you want to keep your existing ally you need to be sure that you have a better relationship with them than any other faction which is not allied to it?

Or is that test only triggered by a situation which requires the faction to make a choice between you or another.

It won't satisfy the victory conditions, you have to eliminate the faction. But vassal's provinces are considered to be under your control, so you don't have to actually conquer 15 provinces (or 45 in the long campaign) to met the victory conditions. Except of course, if your vassal is the faction you have to destroy to achieve the victory.

So, playing Scotland, I physically have to eliminate England. Making them a vassal state would effectively lose me the game, but I would never be able to anyway becuase they are a 'Shadow Faction' for Scotland.

However, I could force France to become my protectorate and if France had 5 provinces, then those five provinces would count towards the 15 I need to win the game.

Beyond that vassals basically work like permanent alliances in terms of diplomacy and relationship.

I think that makes sense, have I got it right?

[Ciaran]

Ditz: Yes, vassalage basically is an alliance on steroids. You get a certain amount of money from your vassals and their lands count as your own. Everything else is just like a normal alliance. Vassals will still act on their own; heck, I had it happen that two vassals of mine (Denmark and Poland, while I was playing France) went to war with each other, which, of course forced me to choose which one to keep as my vassal.

[Didz]

That is weird...sounds like a gliche to escape vassalage to me.

"hey! I've got this great scam. We pretend to be at war with each other and then the idiot has to let one of us go."

[DVX BELLORVM]

So, playing Scotland, I physically have to eliminate England. Making them a vassal state would effectively lose me the game, but I would never be able to anyway becuase they are a 'Shadow Faction' for Scotland.

No, you wouldn't loose the game. No alliance lasts forever, and the vassalage is not an exception. When the time comes, break the alliance and conquer them to win the game.

[andrewt]

In my recent Moors game, the HRE accepted vassalage from me and they broke it after 1-2 turns.

[alpaca]

Gosh I had a weird one today. Apparently a faction can be a vassal to more than one opponent.
I'm playing an English campaign at the moment, and the HRE became a vassal to both Milan and Hungary, being shown as a vassal for both factions in the diplomacy scroll, too

[DVX BELLORVM]

On a secondary point: Can anyone confirm what impact vassalage has on Faction Goals and diplomacy, for example, if Scotland were to make England a vassal state would that satisfy their faction goal for the Short Campaign or does elimination mean exactly that,

It won't satisfy the victory conditions, you have to eliminate the faction. But vassal's provinces are considered to be under your control, so you don't have to actually conquer 15 provinces (or 45 in the long campaign) to met the victory conditions. Except of course, if your vassal is the faction you have to destroy to achieve the victory.

also is is possible to declare war on a vassal without going to war with its protector?

I think it is, but I'm not 100% sure. As someone already mentioned, the vassal can have it's own allies and enemies, independent of it's master.