Rising to speak after Ansehelm report Arnold begins pacing the Diet floor
Lord Ansehelm ,
I entirely agree with your general outline. I was not talking about taking Krakow until the next Diet session as we have standing legislation preventing that.
My timing was not clear and therefore I was not clear. By the time of the next Diet session I'm more than sure I will have retaken Budapest and will be in a position to take a closer look at Krakow.
At a strategic level, what I see is Krakow holding a position slightly too far South for the Franconia's to deal with and likewise slightly too far north for the my own Austrian House to easily deal with.
As you state Ansehelm, if Austria or Franconia take Krakow it will pull us too far from our central front to adequately defend it well.
Your thoughts on the BHA and its potential usage are intriguing. With the final island taken by the next Diet session the BHA would be relatively task free.
The Sicilian’s have been allies for longer than I can remember so I do not see them suddenly committing such a suicidal act as attacking us from the southern tip of the Italian peninsula.
Our southern border would potentially not need much protection.
There is much to ponder and certainly the idea of two house armies is gaining a legitimate momentum given our extended borders.
Bookmarks