Cannabis and MPs

[Idaho]

No doubt there is a qualitative difference between today's skunk strains and the old fashioned stuff that was around when government ministers (and myself ) were students. It's not just the potency, but the balance between different cannabinoids is different. Skunk has been bred for high THC content, but the cannabinol counter-balance has reduced enormously, making the effects very unlike the hippy-era 'brands'.

Once again the moralising prohibition brigade have made another convert. They can't convince people that cannabis should be banned so they go around telling people that what we have now is 'new cannabis' which is different. Didn't Reagan's administration have a crackdown on weed in the 80's saying that cannabis had increased in potency 1400 times?

Take a look at this for the facts.

Would you go into a bar, ask for "a drink please" and quaff down whatever you were given without asking? Well maybe you would, and with cannabis you have no choice but to. Wit legalisation people can choose what they smoke.

The real question is - if cannabis 2.0 is bad, is this an admission that cannabis 1.0 is ok?