The Scottish representative looks scornfully at the Polish one.
This "proof" I see seems rather weak to me. One is a suspect report of a French spy. Even if that one is true it has no bearing on whether sabotage was committed by the French, as only assassins are trained to do that kind of damage. All it shows is that France is as interested as all of us in what goes on beyond their borders.
The second report is of a French Noble obviously being protected by his bodyguard assassin from the threat of foreign assassins, and on French soil. He most likely is returning from building watchtowers on the border with his rather aggressive neighbor, a wise view in my opinion. I'd note that the Polish king himself is now protected by an assassin, should we call him the culprit if we happen to find him marching about his own land?
Obviously there was no assassin at all. The building was most likely destroyed by some disgruntled or drunk Danish peasants and the Danish King is using it as an excuse to stir up trouble.
Originally Posted by Ramses II CP
Bookmarks