I think you’re being pessimistic because you're used to having the West as being the lone superpower, which is now losing that status. If China or India becomes a superpower, that doesn't have to mean the West will no longer be one. It could mean that the West is no longer 1st place, but I don't think that's a bad thing.
It’s true that China and India have the potential to become the most powerful countries. But I don’t think the West will be way behind if that happens. The world is more connected economically and with information than it was before. It’s not like when the West surpassed China. China didn’t know what was going on with Europe. So China thought there'd be nothing wrong if she went on an isolationist path and not gain outside ideas in the future. Nowadays, the West would know if China or India becomes dangerously powerful. If that happens, the West will wake up and do something with themselves. Also, countries like the US are heavily connected economically with the world. If that country suffers economically, then much of the world will feel the shockwave.
And Asia has a weakness too. I used to think that the West was in decline and would be surpassed by Asia. But then, Asia suffered from a financial crisis. Later on, many Western countries recovered from a long recession and had a long period of robust economies.
If there is another world war between the Western powers, then that will bring a great decline to the West. But it doesn't look like the West is looking for another WW. The 21st century is different from the past. If the world continues to work together, then the whole world will survive on and on.
I think it's too early to consider China and India as our future enemies. There's enough time to avoid a bad relationship.Originally Posted by LegioXXXUlpiaVictrix
Immigrants have been entering the US for a long time. From the Africans to the Irish to the Mexicans, a lot of them started their life in America with a difficult life. The US is still doing fine now.Originally Posted by LegioXXXUlpiaVictrix
I feel sad for the soldiers who are in the war zone, but overall, it's Iraq and Afghanistan who are suffering. Western countries are being untouched, and terrorism is quite rare in those countries.Originally Posted by LegioXXXUlpiaVictrix
In addition, the technological gap of weapons is much greater than when Rome faced her enemies. If the terrorists win, they win because the Western powers no longer have the stomach for war. The Western military won't be beaten in a major battle.
China is not a democratic country. But like you said before, China is rising. Democracy is of course the desirable way. But as China and many other countries have proven us, a non-democratic country can grow stronger too.Originally Posted by LegioXXXUlpiaVictrix
It’s because countries like the US are wealthy, so kids don’t feel eager for education as much as a Chinese or an Indian student would. If more and more Americans can’t get a decent job, I’m sure the students will wake up and start studying. I heard that in the old days of Western countries, you could get a decent job without college. Meanwhile, people in 3rd World countries needed a good education to avoid a poor life (and in a worst case to avoid starvation). And Chinese and Indian parents tend to push their kids more in education.Originally Posted by LegioXXXUlpiaVictrix
It’s difficult for an entrepreneur to start a new business in an advanced country because of the competition with big businesses that are already there. Anyway, I don’t think this has anything to do with the decline of the West.Originally Posted by LegioXXXUlpiaVictrix
While I think it’s good to conserve the culture, I don’t think losing it will bring a decline to a country. Look at how much culture that the wealthy Asians lost.Originally Posted by LegioXXXUlpiaVictrix
Bookmarks