Feminist conspiracy!

[LittleGrizzly]

I kinda thought this was a joke at first so i was just having fun with the whole bill monica thing...

Correct, but the problem is as Sinan stated it, that these days there's not equality, but equality with preferential treatment, which is inequality.

If were talking individual relationships i think theres still alot more alpha males with beta females than the other way around but i think you mean women's rights in general....

I think the reason for the preferential treatment is kind of the same as affirmative action in america, because they (women) didn't have the same rights as men they have started from a worse position so the idea behind the inequality is a quick game of catch up.

Now i do kind of believe in temporary inequality to try and make up for previous years of inequality because the stated end aim is equality, I do not think for a second we are in a position were women are about to take over and all men become subservient so for the moment this does not worry me...

[drone]

That's also typical of the liberal mass media, to depict someone as violent in movies and associate defense of masculine ideals with this, thus trying to give the message that being a man makes you violent.

I don't think you know what that book/movie was really about.

[Vladimir]

Do we have a "whatever" with attitude smiley?

[Sasaki Kojiro]

Rodion, I think you should start a bareknuckle boxing league in your basement. That'll show the feminists.

[Ser Clegane]

This is not going very well.

This thread is closed until further notice.

[Ser Clegane]

A last repsonse added on request from Rodion.

If were talking individual relationships i think theres still alot more alpha males with beta females than the other way around but i think you mean women's rights in general....

I think the reason for the preferential treatment is kind of the same as affirmative action in america, because they (women) didn't have the same rights as men they have started from a worse position so the idea behind the inequality is a quick game of catch up.

The problem is, we don't need affirmative action for a sex because it's classes, families and geographical areas that slip behind, not individual members of families or a sex. Women don't have any historical baggage worsening their position at present, rather the opposite. Affirmative action for racial groups at a disadvantage is an entirely different manner, but these actions too tend to go from the poorest of the rich group to the richest of the poor group as in all forms of charity. It's the same with foreign aid.

Now i do kind of believe in temporary inequality to try and make up for previous years of inequality because the stated end aim is equality,

The problem is there's over-regulation if the new generation that is growing up is repressed in the other way. If you then on top of that keep pushing it in that direction, then you'll end up with something extremely much in the other direction, much more extreme than what you had before in the first direction. The temporary inequality bit is my generation where most males are being repressed, now it's time to start regulating the other way to make sure we get to a good, equal position in around 30 years. If you want a pendulum to end up stationary in the middle, would you give it a push in the direction it is moving, when it is about to pass the middle point?