Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: The Channel Islands?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Second-hand chariot salesman Senior Member macsen rufus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Ratae Corieltauvorum
    Posts
    2,481

    Default Re: The Channel Islands?

    Those islands were never important
    Hmmm, you can make a lot of people feel very slighted about their national heritage with sweeping statements like that.

    Let's see, in the time frame of Empires, I can instantly think of: General Isaac Brock, Admiral de Saumarez, "Blue Beard" the privateer (or was it Black Beard, I can never remember which), not to mention their role as an entrepot/smuggling route between Britain, Europe and the New World, and being a constant cause of tension between Britain and France throughout the era. Beside the esteemed Admiral de Saumarez (still a national hero in Sweden, btw) a lot of Channel Islanders served in the navies of the day, earning themselves the nickname of "Chickadees" (non-English speakers, "Ch'i qui dit?" being the Guernesiaise for "What did he say?" )


    ANCIENT: TW

    A mod for Medieval:TW (with VI)

    Discussion forum thread

    Download A Game of Thrones Mod v1.4

  2. #2

    Default Re: The Channel Islands?

    Quote Originally Posted by macsen rufus View Post
    Beside the esteemed Admiral de Saumarez (still a national hero in Sweden, btw) a lot of Channel Islanders served in the navies of the day, earning themselves the nickname of "Chickadees" (non-English speakers, "Ch'i qui dit?" being the Guernesiaise for "What did he say?" )

    Who is this guy? I'm Swedish, a bit of a history buff, and I've never heard the name:) Wikipedia doesnt tell anything either.

    While a place like the channel islands might have been important in real life it is uncertain whether they fit with the scale or level of abstraction of a game such as total war, especially as there are other very populous provinces nearby. Islands like the Azores or Bermuda that would be more important for gameplay.

    EDIT: I think I found him (I assume he is the James Saumarez who commanded the Baltic navy during Napoleonic times). Not quite a Swedish national hero even if he was appreciated by the king (we've mostly tried to forget the war of 1808-09 as it was a huge disaster that cost us a third of the country).
    Last edited by Zaleukos; 06-18-2008 at 07:25.

  3. #3
    Member Member PBI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,176

    Default Re: The Channel Islands?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zaleukos View Post
    Islands like the Azores or Bermuda that would be more important for gameplay.
    Nice idea, it occurs to me that neither chain is present in M2TW. Didn't Columbus actually sail from the Canaries?

    Definitely need lots of islands in the New World and SE Asia, I'm pretty sure some empires such as the Dutch consisted of mostly islands rather than huge landmasses. In Europe they don't need too many, though it might be nice if the Knights of St John on Malta could just about squeeze in (as a rebel settlement with some unique units, I suspect, not important enough for a full faction). Plus obviously Rockall, which you can clearly see must have been of vital strategic importance due to its key central location, large population and abundant natural resources.

  4. #4

    Default Re: The Channel Islands?

    Quote Originally Posted by PBI
    Plus obviously Rockall, which you can clearly see must have been of vital strategic importance due to its key central location, large population and abundant natural resources.
    Yes, with mercenary Periwinkle Musketeers and recruitable Explorers.
    www.empiretotalwar.co.uk

    Why do today what you can put off untill tomorrow?

  5. #5

    Default Re: The Channel Islands?

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Bloody Infantry View Post
    Nice idea, it occurs to me that neither chain is present in M2TW. Didn't Columbus actually sail from the Canaries?
    He did. Such islands would also be a lot more important if there was a limit to how far ships could go without resupplying (either from a friendly port or by simply stopping to chop down a few trees and refill sweet water supplies).

    Other priority islands would be the Carribean sugar colonies, they were immensely valuable and it is rather telling that France rather gave up Canada after the seven years war than lose Martinique and Guadeloupe... The Indonesian islands (which are a good deal bigger than anything mentioned in the thread, and extremely populous) should also be in as they constituted most of the Dutch empire (provided the map covers that area, does it?).

    Rockall could be supplemented with Hans Island, a gem that still stirs up emotions between the commonwealth and the foul Danes;)
    Last edited by Zaleukos; 06-18-2008 at 16:41.

  6. #6
    Member Member PBI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,176

    Default Re: The Channel Islands?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zaleukos View Post
    Such islands would also be a lot more important if there was a limit to how far ships could go without resupplying (either from a friendly port or by simply stopping to chop down a few trees and refill sweet water supplies).
    Would become a big consideration if steam ships make it into the game (a bit early I know, but could sneak in as a high end tech), since I believe this was essentially the reason Britain held the Falklands, and various other small islands, so that ships could refuel every few thousand miles rather than carrying enough coal to make the whole trip.

    They were not populous, they were not strategically placed, they had no relevant resource, etc, etc, etc.
    Unlike Rockall.
    Last edited by PBI; 06-18-2008 at 19:16.

  7. #7
    Vindicative son of a gun Member Jolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Chuck Norris' hand is the only hand that can beat a Royal Flush.
    Posts
    3,740

    Default Re: The Channel Islands?

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Bloody Infantry View Post
    Would become a big consideration if steam ships make it into the game (a bit early I know, but could sneak in as a high end tech), since I believe this was essentially the reason Britain held the Falklands, and various other small islands, so that ships could refuel every few thousand miles rather than carrying enough coal to make the whole trip.



    Unlike Rockall.
    It would be funny for Rockall to be in, at least in a Custom Battle option. I wonder what would happen to the ships who'd hit the rock... :P
    BLARGH!

  8. #8
    Member Member PBI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,176

    Default Re: The Channel Islands?

    Ah, a custom sea battle. Yes, that could be interesting. Rather than a land custom battle on Rockall, which would basically consist of the two opposing soldiers clinging onto either sides of the rock until the other falls off.

  9. #9
    Vindicative son of a gun Member Jolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Chuck Norris' hand is the only hand that can beat a Royal Flush.
    Posts
    3,740

    Default Re: The Channel Islands?

    Quote Originally Posted by macsen rufus View Post
    Hmmm, you can make a lot of people feel very slighted about their national heritage with sweeping statements like that.

    Let's see, in the time frame of Empires, I can instantly think of: General Isaac Brock, Admiral de Saumarez, "Blue Beard" the privateer (or was it Black Beard, I can never remember which), not to mention their role as an entrepot/smuggling route between Britain, Europe and the New World, and being a constant cause of tension between Britain and France throughout the era. Beside the esteemed Admiral de Saumarez (still a national hero in Sweden, btw) a lot of Channel Islanders served in the navies of the day, earning themselves the nickname of "Chickadees" (non-English speakers, "Ch'i qui dit?" being the Guernesiaise for "What did he say?" )
    I'm certain Channel Islands are important to its nationals

    As you history within the timeframe of Empire is little, and non-significant. I wouldn't mind having Channel Islands if 80% other more strategic archipelagoes appeared. I'll clarify this later
    BLARGH!

  10. #10
    Vindicative son of a gun Member Jolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Chuck Norris' hand is the only hand that can beat a Royal Flush.
    Posts
    3,740

    Default Re: The Channel Islands?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jolt View Post
    I'm certain Channel Islands are important to its nationals

    As you history within the timeframe of Empire is little, and non-significant. I wouldn't mind having Channel Islands if 80% other more strategic archipelagoes appeared. I'll clarify this later
    Bleh, this needs not clarifying as other people have already said it for me. For the Channel Archipelago, to be in, we'd have to see basically every archipelago from England to India. Azores, Madeira, Canaries, Gorée, Cape Verde, Asunción Island, São Tomé, Mauritius, Zanzibar, Seychelles, Reunión, Maldives, Laccadives and Nicobar Islands. And I'm saying those that actually make sense (and those which I instantly remember as important) entering the game. Every single island of those deserves to be in way, way before Channel islands can even be considered.
    They were simply historically non-important, and noone cared about them, except those who exerted control over it. They were not populous, they were not strategically placed, they had no relevant resource, etc, etc, etc.
    Last edited by Jolt; 06-18-2008 at 17:46.
    BLARGH!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO