Lets not get into too much of a neanderthal-bigot tizzy. This is about whether it was appropriate to use Carolinian state appropriated funds to advertise South Carolina as a homosexual hotspot throughout Europe. It isn't my money, so I don't really have a say - but the article was about whether people should get pissed about it.

I simply understand why they are pissed - and I have said it is like advertising South Carolina as a Sado-masochism hotspot. Not an illegal activity unless practiced graphically in public, but would you want your advertising money to go to something like that about your own state? I doubt it - hence the resignation of a state employee and the inquiry. Get over it.