Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    I'm currently making what I hope will one day be a possible manual for EB (completely unofficial), an I'm having some difficulty in finding out the correct Historical formations for Rome, after they abandoned the Quincux. I'm going with a slightly edited version of QS's guide for army composition, but it is not there, and neither is the layout for the Imperial Armies (I'm guessing they are the same.)
    There are the 4 Legions (I say 4, one is just a unit of Artillery, but there are 3 FM's there, but one is a Local Yokel General.)

    Thanks in advance for any help, I'm really hoping that this project will turn out nice. I could even edit it for EBII, when that comes out.

    Also, does anyone know where I could find Historical Layouts for all the factions? Big ask I know, but I'm a bit lost, especially with the 'Barbarian' Factions, where most sources just say they charged in great hordes, and the ones that don't don't give enough info.

  2. #2
    Vicious Celt Warlord Member Celtic_Punk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    In your kitchen, raiding your fridge!
    Posts
    1,575

    Default Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    most northern european armies would line up, scream a rousing warcry signaling the impending enemy's doom and charge forth!

    there would be tactics depending on the situation of the battle obviously, but most didnt have formations, they believed in the ability of the individual warrior.
    Last edited by Celtic_Punk; 07-29-2008 at 20:14.
    'Who Dares WINS!' - SAS
    "The republic stands for truth and honour. For all that is noblest in our race. By truth and honour, principle and sacrifice alone will Ireland be free."-Liam Mellows


    Who knows? If it's a enough day we may all end up Generals!"

  3. #3

    Default Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    Quote Originally Posted by Celtic_Punk View Post
    most northern european armies would line up, scream a rousing warcry signaling the impending enemy's doom and charge forth!
    True for some armies, but most were fairly organized. not quite on the level of SPQR, but reasonably enough. It was less 'CHARGE!', and more, 'That group of Naked people with the big swords, CHARGE!'

    That's something I'm trying to get accross.

    BTT, I remember finding this completely immense thread, either here or somewhere else in the Guild, about historical army formations. It had the lot, the Romans, the Carthaginians, Hannibal's Cannae, The lot. Any help finding it will be rewarded by COOKIES!

  4. #4
    Arrogant Ashigaru Moderator Ludens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    9,063
    Blog Entries
    1

    Lightbulb Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    Quote Originally Posted by Celtic_Punk View Post
    most northern european armies would line up, scream a rousing warcry signaling the impending enemy's doom and charge forth!

    there would be tactics depending on the situation of the battle obviously, but most didnt have formations, they believed in the ability of the individual warrior.
    :sigh: Although Celtic warriors tended to be individualistic, it doesn't take a genius to see that soldiers in formation work better. For example, Polybius mentions that at Telamon the Romans were impressed by the order of the Celtic host. The impression that Celtic armies were simple mobs mostly comes from battles like Watling street, where the Romans fought what was essentially a horde of enraged farmers.
    Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!

  5. #5

    Default Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ludens View Post
    :sigh: Although Celtic warriors tended to be individualistic, it doesn't take a genius to see that soldiers in formation work better. For example, Polybius mentions that at Telamon the Romans were impressed by the order of the Celtic host. The impression that Celtic armies were simple mobs mostly comes from battles like Watling street, where the Romans fought what was essentially a horde of enraged farmers.
    OOOOH ARRRRRRRRRRRRR! Sorry, Don't judge me.

    But seriously, It's true.

  6. #6
    Vicious Celt Warlord Member Celtic_Punk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    In your kitchen, raiding your fridge!
    Posts
    1,575

    Default Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    well yeah, there are cases where celts used formations, especially later celts, like robert the bruce, who created the legendary SCHILTRON! (stupid BI is only a few hundred years off :rolls eyes: )
    'Who Dares WINS!' - SAS
    "The republic stands for truth and honour. For all that is noblest in our race. By truth and honour, principle and sacrifice alone will Ireland be free."-Liam Mellows


    Who knows? If it's a enough day we may all end up Generals!"

  7. #7
    Member Member Skandinav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    132

    Default Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    Both celtic and germanic peoples used formations, shield-walls and such were common and some like the germanic spearmen, EB´s Speutogardaz were known for their tight phalanx-like formation for example as was the helvetii for theirs ( EB´s Mori Gaesum ). The written accounts are numerous, you could look up Caesar´s commentaries on his Gallic Wars for more information on these north-european ones, and I do not believe any EB faction to not have utilized army formations, at least not with their professional armies.

    The late ( in EB´s time frame ) roman army formations were not very much unlike the manipulatory tactics from earlier republican times but still often, as before but perhaps even more so, the three battle-lines were joined before the engagement and before the skirmishers had retreated behind them. This was, as before, not a rigid tactic, nor was it used rigidly, but the three-line system, with veterans in the back and initial quincunx pattern deployment of the cohorts did survive into the imperial age.
    Last edited by Skandinav; 07-30-2008 at 02:29.

  8. #8
    Jesus Member lobf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Nazareth
    Posts
    531

    Default Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    Quote Originally Posted by Celtic_Punk View Post
    well yeah, there are cases where celts used formations, especially later celts, like robert the bruce, who created the legendary SCHILTRON! (stupid BI is only a few hundred years off :rolls eyes: )
    Now, I know little about Celts, but I would imagine it was not rare that they used formations. Are you basing your assertion off of anything you have read, or is this simply what you believe?

  9. #9
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,453

    Default Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    Quote Originally Posted by Che Roriniho View Post
    I'm currently making what I hope will one day be a possible manual for EB (completely unofficial), an I'm having some difficulty in finding out the correct Historical formations for Rome, after they abandoned the Quincux. I'm going with a slightly edited version of QS's guide for army composition, but it is not there, and neither is the layout for the Imperial Armies (I'm guessing they are the same.)
    There are the 4 Legions (I say 4, one is just a unit of Artillery, but there are 3 FM's there, but one is a Local Yokel General.)
    There's no formations for Marian legions in my guide, because there were no longer "standard" ones. Sometimes they'd use the three-line quincunx, other times deploy in two or even one line. With standardisation of equipment came increased flexibility of tactics.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  10. #10
    White Panther (Legalize Weed!) Member AlexanderSextus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    THIS! IS! JERSEY!
    Posts
    613

    Default Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    so when would they use the quincunx instead of regular battle lines (and vice versa)?
    Do you hate Drug Cartels? Do You believe that the Drug War is basically a failure? Do you think that if we Legalized the Cannabis market, that use rates would drop, we could put age limits on cannabis, tax it, and other wise regulate it? Join The ORG Marijuana Policy Project!

    In American politics, similar to British politics, we have a choice between being shot in our left testicle or the right testicle. Both parties advocate pissing on the little guys, only in different ways and to a different little guy.

  11. #11
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,453

    Default Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    Quote Originally Posted by AlexanderSextus View Post
    so when would they use the quincunx instead of regular battle lines (and vice versa)?
    Whenever the general deemed it appropriate. That's why I didn't include any; reading the reports of late Republican battles, different generals did all kinds of different things at different times.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  12. #12
    Member Member Skandinav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    132

    Default Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    Quote Originally Posted by AlexanderSextus View Post
    so when would they use the quincunx instead of regular battle lines (and vice versa)?
    Your question sound as if within the boundaries of the theory stating that the quincunx formation was held even after the armies had clashed; the mainstream view on the quincunx though is that the three battle-lines was joined ( probably with small intervals between the units ) before the battle, and that the maniples were only for temporary maneuvering.
    So the quincunx and regular battle lines are actually part of the same system, the triplex acies quincunx, although they have been used both together and apart.

    Regarding standardization of tactics, none such existed in pre-marian times either, although some, like the abovementioned system, was commonly used.
    Battle-reports, the few we have in such detail, indeed suggests that manipular/manipulatory tactics were used less frequently in the late republic but also that the romans still favoured multiple lines of engagement.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    Going by this then QS, How would your 4 legion system (I have doubled up everything in the Socii, and an Allied General to keep them under control) work as a quincunx? Thanks so much for everything btw.

    Righto, anyone know where I can find what a Makedon army would look like? (Not sure if they have a reform, if so, before and after if possible.)

  14. #14
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,453

    Default Re: Imperial/Marian Army Formations?

    Quote Originally Posted by Skandinav View Post
    Your question sound as if within the boundaries of the theory stating that the quincunx formation was held even after the armies had clashed; the mainstream view on the quincunx though is that the three battle-lines was joined ( probably with small intervals between the units ) before the battle, and that the maniples were only for temporary maneuvering.
    So the quincunx and regular battle lines are actually part of the same system, the triplex acies quincunx, although they have been used both together and apart.
    Goldsworthy categorically rejects the idea that the quincunx was for deployment/movement only, and that they were joined together in battle. I find his reasoning persuasive that arraying troops takes a lot of time, and it's a further waste of time to deploy them in the quincunx only to collapse the gaps once battle starts.

    Quote Originally Posted by Che Roriniho View Post
    Going by this then QS, How would your 4 legion system (I have doubled up everything in the Socii, and an Allied General to keep them under control) work as a quincunx? Thanks so much for everything btw.
    Still the same as the Camillian/Polybian ones - Romans in the centre, Allies on the flanks/wings. If we go with a three-unit legion (one Aquila, one regular, one "veteran"), two of those in the centre with units of allies outside them. Allies for all your skirmishers and cavalry, too.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO