Does the campaign difficulty setting reduce income and public order?

[Atraphoenix]

Hello, I play now a pahlava campaign whose AAR is also posted by me.

I have set Hard campaign Difficulty medium battle dif..

When I checked one ofmy settlements in the settlement income report page. It says that the settlement has 1500 mining income but the building page says that the city has mines and the picture of the mines
it say that the mine has 5000 income

so in hard difficulty is it normal that appr. only one third the real income the building shows can be taken.

this is simple to cahnge in descr_building doc

what worries me is that for example temple in which is written has 10% law / happines bonus etc. only % 3 or something, is it lower than the written info description or not?

If it is too complex I can add pictures

thanks for your contributions and comments from now on...

[Theages]

The difference between the building card and the actual income from mines is a known issue inherited from vanilla RTW. I do not think the difficulty setting has anything to do with it.
H or VH in campaign difficulty raise the aggresiveness of rebels. They will actually attack your towns.

[Ludens]

The difference between the building card and the actual income from mines is a known issue inherited from vanilla RTW. I do not think the difficulty setting has anything to do with it.
H or VH in campaign difficulty raise the aggresiveness of rebels. They will actually attack your towns.

Correct. VH will also give a 10.000 mnai bonus to A.I. factions every turn.

[Atraphoenix]

I am happy with hard. rebels besieged my towns twice. even they captured one of them! my historical
capital Hekatompylos.

I increased mining income because it was stupid to have 600 income l1 mines to balance the game.

but I also increase the value 20 000 and time 12 ;l2 mines 50 000 24 seasons

so the provinces that has mines now worths conquering

it is stpid to have same income with agriculture

I had 30 provinces yesterday

my agricultural income was 17 18 000
but my mine income 19 000

it is stupid man

now it is around 27 000

I coded desc_building mines income 40 - 100 l2 from 100 300 and ı do not think that it is cheating because all faction has mines so it is fair enough ...

otherwise my economy will doom .. I never used console cheats except toggle_fow

now the ratio income of mines and agriculture 2 - 2.5 for me logical enough. even ı must be more if you think mining must give at least 5 times better income in life in my country 10 15 more income
but ı adapted it to the game there should be even level 3 mines according to my opinion but its value
must bu 100 000 and its coded income may be 500 with 40 turns.

and in game although its written 25000 it real income is around should be 8 000 even worse
if you count 15000 mining income is written but it gives in economy page 4500 only!

[Centurio Nixalsverdrus]

The Latifundiae and other industrial agricultural estates were literally cash cows. But in EB and also in vanilla this is represented through an increase in trade income, not in agricultural income. The latter is only generated by the farms upgrade buildings like "Agricultura Provincialis" for example or "Georgia Polyphoros". For the Latifundia / Kleroi complex you have to make a land grant at first. Doesn't work with lvl 4 governments though.

[Atraphoenix]

I do not have any gov type 4 even type 2 and 3
just reformed parthian goverment and I do not think that it may have a problem.

[Skandinav]

Are you guys positive that public order isn´t affected by the campaign difficulty setting or are you merely uncertain ? I know official facts are a bit scarce on these matters but I could swear to have read that it was related somewhere on the old RTW forums in a statement from a developer which to my regret still evades me despite my otherwise thorough search for it. Someones quote in someones off-topic link...