
Originally Posted by
machinor
I'd say the king would surely choose his younger son Antiochos over a bastard. But he could not have done that before Antiochos' glorious victory because only then would the army accept him over the more experienced and influental Euphamios. But there would certainly be hard feelings. Sure, Euphamios is unselfish, but the agony of an unthankful father could make him bitter. And there is nothing more dangerous to a newly elected heir than a embittered half-brother with a lot of military fame and good connections to the army and the court. Beware the ides of september!
Do not put him in charge of Egypt, since that is a very rich region. Put him in command on the eastern border where he will be busy fighting nomads, Seleukids and rebellious Easterners. A man's mind constantly occupied with fighting won't have the time to scheme.
Bookmarks