Results 1 to 30 of 56

Thread: The politics of games.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Robot Unicorn Member Kekvit Irae's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    3,758

    Default Re: The politics of games.

    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg View Post
    You propose dropping the moderation of this one onto the backroom team?
    No, I propose the creation of a new sub-forum inside the Arena for such discussion, as noted in the very first line of my first post.



    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg View Post
    Games Workshop? Nothing to do with the arena, even with a speculative backroom. Child slavery isn't our territory, and that would be the real subject. Games would only be a sideline.
    First, it is my understanding that Games Workshop is Arena material.

    The Arena
    A place to discuss any games not from the Total War series; also for game reviews, consoles and console games, etc.
    Bolded the good parts. Unless the description suddenly changed to PC and console games only, traditional games are allowed.
    Second, the child slavery part was a joke, to place emphasis on the "OMG, _____ is an evil overlord!" syndrome currently residing in the Arena now. I would have put in EA instead of GW, but I'm getting tired of all the EA bashing going on lately.

  2. #2
    Camel Lord Senior Member Capture The Flag Champion Martok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    In my own little world....but it's okay, they know me there.
    Posts
    8,257

    Default Re: The politics of games.

    For what it's worth -- and speaking only for myself -- I started those two topics (the Amazon protest and the Gamers Bill of Rights) in the Arena simply because it seemed the most appropriate place. These are issues that affect gamers, after all, so where else to better discuss them? Granted, there's a bit of overlap with the Backroom when they have threads discussing the RIAA and whatnot, but that's more the exception rather than the rule.

    Not that I want the Arena to be forever dominated by such discussions, of course -- I agree its primary purpose is still to discuss actual games. That's how it should be. Still, I don't see the harm in actually discussing issues that matter to gamers from time to time. (It's not like the Frontroom is all sunshine and lollipops, just for another example.) Besides which, I concur with froggy that these are simply hot topics at the moment, and will eventually fade in time.
    Last edited by Martok; 09-21-2008 at 19:36.
    "MTW is not a game, it's a way of life." -- drone

  3. #3
    Time Lord Member The_Doctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The TARDIS
    Posts
    2,040

    Default Re: The politics of games.

    Maybe you should give it a week or two, and then see if the problem is still there and if it is then work something out.



    You propose dropping the moderation of this one onto the backroom team? Otherwise it will be the same two victims volunteers reading the posts. We'd just have to do more clicking.
    child slavery

  4. #4

    Default Re: The politics of games.

    Yeah I'd say wait for a while before adding it. From what I've seen the arena only has its politcal moments once in a while. Other than that there are plenty of true arena threads. But adding a prefix to the name might be an easier fix. Like in the backroom or tw sections.
    Tho' I've belted you an' flayed you,
    By the livin' Gawd that made you,
    You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din!
    Quote Originally Posted by North Korea
    It is our military's traditional response to quell provocative actions with a merciless thunderbolt.

  5. #5
    Member Member Ferret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    3,679

    Default Re: The politics of games.

    The Arena isn't exactly one of the most active forums anyway, if you removed all the threads about DRM and other things that would go into the backroom of it, the Arena would become even more desolate. There are little enough threads with new posts being added to keep up with the ones you want to read and ignore the ones you don't want, the titles are apt enough to help you decide whether you want to read it.

    So, in short, I agree with Mouza.

  6. #6

    Default Re: The politics of games.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kekvit Irae View Post
    No, I propose the creation of a new sub-forum inside the Arena for such discussion, as noted in the very first line of my first post.
    You've also said you are sick of seeing these posts. My point is, either you'll be reading them because they are in the arena, or you won't because they aren't. Creating a backroom does not alter this.

    I wrote the arena's description years ago, same as I wrote the welcome topic and rules. The arena is - and always has been - for computer games, or, as they've been called by society and the internet at large for most of my life, games. Hence the way everything talks about demos, platforms, consoles, handhelds, PCs ... Conversely, board games are still called board games, card games are called card games, and war games war games. If I'd meant to refer to them then I'd have done so. On the very rare occasions someone has posted a topic on a traditional game I've tended let it pass because there is no correct forum for those topics. They show up in the front room too, and fit there equally well. If people want to talk about painting warhammer miniatures then it's mostly off-topic. If they want to talk about the evil ethics behind them then it's totally off-topic. EA's ethics still have some relation to games.

    Agreed on wanting the patrons' views. It's why I posted the link; it would have been sad if people missed this topic and didn't get chance to have their say. I'm not the only one who doesn't get out and about much. If anything gets changed (or not) as many people as possible should be content with the decision.


    Quote Originally Posted by Tincow
    Well, from a legal perspective I don't think that's quite right.
    From a legal perspective we can discuss whatever we like, provided we're not giving out links to cracks or telling people how to pirate games. From a working perspective, we've had upset messages about certain topics discussing things like secuROM.


    Quote Originally Posted by Pape
    Anyone guess why I hold the Arena dear?
    Is it because you can play with our friendly lions and build sandcastles on the fighting ground?




    How do people feel about a light compromise? Keep the games threads targeted more towards games, and keep the bulk of the DRM and similar discussion in a seperate topic in the same forum? Not a total seperation, just an attempt to reduce the way some games threads end up being more about the copy protection than the playing experience. Not heavy mod action, just a post nudging the discussion back towards the game and highlighting the other thread.

    Yes, in the end it comes down to mod discretion. However it's usually easy to see when a thread is running too far off topic, and it's usually very simple to solve with a single post.

    I stress that this wouldn't remove all DRM discussion from the game topic. The idea is to divert the flow if and when it threatens to drown.




    And for everyone saying the arena is quiet, it wouldn't be if people spent more time talking about games and less time playing them!
    Frogbeastegg's Guide to Total War: Shogun II. Please note that the guide is not up-to-date for the latest patch.


  7. #7
    Urwendur Ûrîbêl Senior Member Mouzafphaerre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mikligarðr
    Posts
    6,899

    Default Re: The politics of games.

    .
    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg
    How do people feel about a light compromise? Keep the games threads targeted more towards games, and keep the bulk of the DRM and similar discussion in a separate topic in the same forum?
    No. It's little different from splitting the forum. The games exist with everything related to them. We can't and should not separate issues like DRM, system incompatibilities, breaking bugs etc. from the in-game stuff. It was the whole point of my post. (That aside, self censorship is hardly the right way to go. )
    .
    Last edited by Mouzafphaerre; 09-18-2008 at 02:23. Reason: smileys
    Ja mata Tosa Inu-sama, Hore Tore, Adrian II, Sigurd, Fragony

    Mouzafphaerre is known elsewhere as Urwendil/Urwendur/Kibilturg...
    .

  8. #8
    Robot Unicorn Member Kekvit Irae's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    3,758

    Default Re: The politics of games.

    We could always implement a word filter system. Simply filter every third word in the Arena to 'StarDock'. Everyone loves StarDock, so using this method everyone in the Arena would be happy.

    Let's take (with apologies) Mouza's post above as an example:

    It's little StarDock from splitting StarDock forum. The StarDock exist with StarDock related to StarDock. We can't StarDock should not StarDock issues like StarDock, system incompatibilities, StarDock bugs etc. StarDock the in-game StarDock. It was StarDock whole point StarDock my post. (StarDock aside, self StarDock is hardly StarDock right way to StarDock.

  9. #9
    Urwendur Ûrîbêl Senior Member Mouzafphaerre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mikligarðr
    Posts
    6,899

    Default Re: The politics of games.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kekvit Irae View Post
    We could always implement a word filter system. Simply filter every third word in the Arena to 'StarDock'. Everyone loves StarDock, so using this method everyone in the Arena would be happy.

    Let's take (with apologies) Mouza's post above as an example:



    .
    Apologies?! You've just made me laugh out my guts!
    .
    Ja mata Tosa Inu-sama, Hore Tore, Adrian II, Sigurd, Fragony

    Mouzafphaerre is known elsewhere as Urwendil/Urwendur/Kibilturg...
    .

  10. #10
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: The politics of games.

    I take offense by the statement that everybody loves StarDock as I do not have a single game of theirs.
    I demand an apology, a foot massage and the replacement of seven "StarDock"s by "Valve" in the offending piece of quote...

    On the actual issue, I think mentioning the bad copy protection used in the game in a thread about the game is pretty fine but when the whole thread fills up with "I won't StarDock it because of the Valve used!!!1111 " and then a lengthy repost of the same old "The StarDocks will Valve it anyway because this Valve never works, give them 3 StarDocks and it's Valve by the StarDocks and this is screwing with their StarDock Valve anyway and I'm so angry etc. blaValve" then you end up with the same posts in every second thread which makes me think that one topic to cover all sorts of copy protection makes more sense while the game threads can mention it once or twice for those who may not know the game is protected by copy protection x or y and do not want to read the endless ramblings in the copy protection thread. That way everybody gets the vital info and them freedom-loving capitalists can get their thread to be annoyed about copy protections.


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  11. #11
    the G-Diffuser Senior Member pevergreen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,585
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: The politics of games.

    Quote Originally Posted by Husar View Post
    freedom-loving capitalists.
    I love those guys!

    Also, possibly the best "post" ever by Kek.
    Quote Originally Posted by TosaInu
    The org will be org until everyone calls it a day.

    Quote Originally Posted by KukriKhan View Post
    but I joke. Some of my best friends are Vietnamese villages.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lemur
    Anyone who wishes to refer to me as peverlemur is free to do so.

  12. #12
    Camel Lord Senior Member Capture The Flag Champion Martok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    In my own little world....but it's okay, they know me there.
    Posts
    8,257

    Default Re: The politics of games.

    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg View Post
    How do people feel about a light compromise? Keep the games threads targeted more towards games, and keep the bulk of the DRM and similar discussion in a seperate topic in the same forum? Not a total seperation, just an attempt to reduce the way some games threads end up being more about the copy protection than the playing experience. Not heavy mod action, just a post nudging the discussion back towards the game and highlighting the other thread.
    That would be fine with me, at least in theory. I'm a little concerned, however, that it could adversely affect threads about games inextricably linked to DRM (such as Bioshock, Mass Effect, and the now-infamous Spore) -- if invasive and/or inconvenient copy protection software is a major issue with a PC title, then I don't feel it should be shunted off to a general discussion thread about DRM.

    Or are we actually mostly in agreement on this, and I'm just rambling on for no good reason?


    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg View Post
    And for everyone saying the arena is quiet, it wouldn't be if people spent more time talking about games and less time playing them!
    Hey, now! I'll have you know that some of us do our part, thank you very much. I spend way too much time talking about games and not enough time playing them (heck, it's pretty much my MO at this point).
    "MTW is not a game, it's a way of life." -- drone

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO