Is it?
2000 - Putin mentions his desire to join NATO
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...to-722225.html
Gorbachev suggested it after the fall of the Soviet Union
Yeltsin suggested it as well
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...51C1A967958260
I guess I'm dancing around la-la fantasy land. With the expansion of the EU and eventual centralization of that state, the U.S. will no doubt look for a counterweight in the alliance that Canada simply can't provide. We could use that as an excuse to help create a central Asian union similar to the one the Russian Federation has been working on. I'm all about expanding security and helping nations rely less on military deterrence. NATO has provided an excuse for European nations to spend drastically less on defense. Russia is looking for security from China above all else and needs to realize that the west will be an ally; they are part of the west for craps sake.
The whole deal is this - If someone was to say 70 years ago that European nations would be part of one superstate without violent annexation people would call you crazy - possibly in la-la land. It is possible and desirable to create a superstate in central Asia within NATO - with the practical purpose of containing China and India and promoting democratic, socio-capitalist expansion. It also wouldn't be bad to have a massive, functional state that holds massive energy reserves and a small population within the confines of NATO.
It is necessary for security, it is desirable for both parties, and it is doable in the long term. Why is that fantasy land?
Bookmarks