Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: I wouldn't be surprised if....

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    mostly harmless Member B-Wing's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    on the Streets of Rage!
    Posts
    1,070

    Default Re: I wouldn't be surprised if....

    I don't know, I think it might be cool if Anatolia became an even more intense war zone than it already is in EB1. I don't think that it would necessarily the best way to allocate the remaining faction slots, but given all the factions that have already been ruled out, I'm struggling to think of 6 solid contenders even if you count the Galatians. If Galatia was included, they'd have to have a pretty flexible AoR for the surrounding regions in order to build any kind of empire, since there's not a lot of other Celts nearby.

  2. #2
    Uergobretos Senior Member Brennus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Korieltauuon.
    Posts
    7,801

    Default Re: I wouldn't be surprised if....

    Quote Originally Posted by Blxz View Post
    I didn't realize there was such extensive archeaological evidence on any baltic peoples. I thought the main reason that they have never been a faction is that there is just insufficient information on them at that time in history. If there really is that much data then I doubt a lack of governmental knowledge would be the reason for not including them.
    Archaeology alone cannot recreate a faction as much as I wish it could. With regards to the Balts in 272BC we (as far as I know) do not know any tribal names of people inhabitting that region, what they referred to themselves as, the diplomatic stance between the Baltic tribes and their Indo-Aryan, Germanic and Celtic neighbours, the socio-economic models they employed and the personal names of their leaders. Without this info it is impossible to recreate a faction.

    Quote Originally Posted by B_Ray View Post
    I don't know, I think it might be cool if Anatolia became an even more intense war zone than it already is in EB1. I don't think that it would necessarily the best way to allocate the remaining faction slots, but given all the factions that have already been ruled out, I'm struggling to think of 6 solid contenders even if you count the Galatians. If Galatia was included, they'd have to have a pretty flexible AoR for the surrounding regions in order to build any kind of empire, since there's not a lot of other Celts nearby.
    I agree, even if Anatolia already has a substantial number of factions a suitable faction shouldn't be ruled out based on the worry that a region is too crowded. Greece is already crowded and from what I have read in various posts one of the most enjoyable areas to play as a faction. Furthermore the Galatians would add an interesting flavour to a region in which phalanx battles are the norm. With regards to new factions I can't forsee there being any further Hellenic factions considering EBII is already set to include 8 truely Hellenic factions (AS, KH, Makedon, Epeiros, Pergamon, Ptolemies, Bosporans, Baktria). At present there is a fair discrepency in terms of the number of "barbarian" factions 4 Celtic Speakers (Aedui, Arverni, Boii and Pritanoi) 1 Iberian (Lusotana), 1 Dacian (Getai) and one German (Sweboz). The Galatians are probably one of the few "barbarian" factions you could add to the game considering the 272BC start date. The only other "barbarianas" I think you could seriously add would be the Insubres, Belgae, Arevaci and possibly the Marcomanni but none of these tribes enjoy the same historical information as the Galatians (with the exception of the Insubres, however the Insubres were on the retreat from 272BC until their final conquest by the Romans).

    BY 42BC the Galatians had conquered both Phrygia, Cilicia and Lycia and had played a major part in the regions politics throughout this period, fighting Pergamon, Pontos, Rome and the Seleucids and adopting varying diplomatic stances towards each power. As I stated before the Galatians had a far greater impact upon the present EB faction list than factions like the Casse/Pritanoi (conflict with the Belgae c.120-100BC and a brief role in the Gallic Wars) and the Saba. I agree that the EB team was right in choosing the Saka as a faction over the the Galatians, after all the Saka conquered Baktria and established a kingdom in India, but to disqualify them as an EBII faction based purely on a fear that the region they inhabitted would become overcrowed is wrong.

    RE Ludens, I don't expect an answer but, have the Belgae been ruled out as a potential EBII faction?



    donated by ARCHIPPOS for being friendly to new people.
    donated by Macilrille for wit.
    donated by stratigos vasilios for starting new and interesting threads
    donated by Tellos Athenaios as a welcome to Campus Martius


  3. #3
    Xsaçapāvan é Skudra Member Atraphoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    İstanbul, Turkey
    Posts
    1,402

    Default Re: I wouldn't be surprised if....

    I still think galatia will be a luxury if applied.....



    My Submods for EB
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    My AAR/Guides How to assault cities with Horse Archers? RISE OF ARSACIDS! (A Pahlava AAR) - finished
    History is written by the victor." Winston Churchill

  4. #4
    Member Member Huene's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    429

    Default Re: I wouldn't be surprised if....

    as of right now they are not in the EBII build. they may or may not end up in later releases but not the first one

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO