[Council of Villains] A State of Corruption [Concluded]

[ULC]

I'll agree with ATPGs reasoning for now, although I suppose Warman another decent option in the "cut your losses" category.

Unvote:, Vote: classical_hero

Also, ATPG you should know by now that the threat of death is only a minor annoyance for me. In any case, JHT was a "if I have to pick someone" vote. To many people tied present problems in effectively lynching anyone, and thus reducing town effectiveness. It's day 1, I'd like not to set a trend.

[Askthepizzaguy]

Also, ATPG you should know by now that the threat of death is only a minor annoyance for me.

It matches your typical behavior, but it was still worth questioning. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

[Yaropolk]

unvote; vote:ACIN

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

[Sasaki Kojiro]

Starting here:

4 AKWC88 (Robbiecon, Greyblades, Glenn, autolycus)
4 A.C.I.N. (TinCow, God Emperor, Captain Blackadder, Romanic)
4 ATPG (Thefluffyone93, Yaropolk, Sasaki, Rebel Jeb)
3 YLC (Choxorn, Ironside, ACIN)
3 Classical Hero (Renata, Beskar, Winston Hughes)

vote on classical
vote on classical
vote on acin
vote on acin
vote on classical
vote on classical
vote on acin
vote on acin

They end up tied at 7, should be 8 according to me but I didn't count very carefully or pay attention to unvotes.

Seems to me we should lynch one of the leaders from earlier on the off chance that this is a "save my buddy" wagon.

unvote, vote:warman

[Diamondeye]

Starting here:

vote on classical
vote on classical
vote on acin
vote on acin
vote on classical
vote on classical
vote on acin
vote on acin

They end up tied at 7, should be 8 according to me but I didn't count very carefully or pay attention to unvotes.

You counted AA's unvote as well?

[a completely inoffensive name]

I guess no one read my post where I said I don't do the same tactic (helping the mafia) two games in a row. Oh well, cool beans. I got Fallout New Vegas to hold me over until the next large mafia game if this goes against me.

[Double A]

I guess no one read my post where I said I don't do the same tactic (helping the mafia) two games in a row. Oh well, cool beans. I got Fallout New Vegas to hold me over until the next large mafia game if this goes against me.

I saw it, we're just experimenting with ties

Diamondeye's tally is the same that I have locally, except that Beefy should have 2 votes instead of 2x 1 vote, but that doesn't matter really.

Sasaki your starting tally has CH with 3 votes, not 4, and like DE said, Double A unvoted acin.

Just tell me who to vote for so it's a 3-way tie.

[a completely inoffensive name]

Also, I could have sworn we are tied at 8 not 7.

[Romanic]

Diamondeye's tally is the same that I have locally, except that Beefy should have 2 votes instead of 2x 1 vote, but that doesn't matter really.

Sasaki your starting tally has CH with 3 votes, not 4, and like DE said, Double A unvoted acin.

[Winston Hughes]

Ah, sweet irony. No first day would be complete without your tender kiss...

Seems to me we should lynch one of the leaders from earlier on the off chance that this is a "save my buddy" wagon.

Hey, that's the least bad idea yet!

unvote, vote:warman

[ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88]

Everyone hates this big monkey they call AntiWarmancake88

Meanies.

[ULC]

Unvote, Vote: Warman

I shall not let Reenk have complete monopoly of everything funny.

[pevergreen]

I'll agree with ATPGs reasoning for now, although I suppose Warman another decent option in the "cut your losses" category.

Unvote:, Vote: classical_hero

The Jedi council shall not stand for this!

I mean, uhh...

If we're cutting losses, we should do as the Yarapolks do, and take one with a track record.

Unvote, Vote: ACIN

I no longer need you, I have others to entertain me.

[classical_hero]

So many vote changes. This is getting confusing.

[Greyblades]

here:

Tally:
6 A.C.I.N. (TinCow, God Emperor, Captain Blackadder, Romanic, Pevergreen, Yarpolk)
5 Classical Hero (ATPG, YLC, Renata, Beskar, Winston Hughes)
4 AKWC88 (Robbiecon, Greyblades, Glenn, autolycus)
3 ATPG (Thefluffyone93, Sasaki, Rebel Jeb)
3 YLC (Choxorn, Ironside, ACIN)
3 Double A (Nightbringer, Classical Hero, Beefy187)
2 Glenn (dcmort93, woad&fangs)
2 Beskar (Secura, ByzantineKnight)
1 Seon (DeathisYonder)
1 Skooma (Diamondeye)
1 TinCow (Cecil XIX)
1 Khazaar (Khazaar)
1 Captain Blackadder (Frozen In Ice)
1 pevergreen (Insanious)
1 Beefy187 (Skooma Addict)
1 Winston Hughes (johnhughtom)
1 Sasaki Kojiro (Motep)
1 dcmort93 (Double A)

6 Abstain (ReenkR, Seon, Nictel, Csargo, landlubber, Jarema)

44/47 players having voted this round

[Jarema]

I want ATPG and ACIN to stay alive... they add to my playing experience.
So, vote: Classical_hero

[Seon]

Unvote, Vote classical hero. you were the one who stole my present, were you?

[Double A]

unvote, vote: ACIN

I don't feel loved anymore...

Unvote, Vote: Double A

Hi AA!

Hi Beefy!

To make you feel better, HoS: Beefy

[Winston Hughes]

So many vote changes. This is getting confusing.

I diagnose a severe case of casual scumminess, brought on by repeatedly getting away with it. The only cure is to lynch you until you start playing like a townie (or at least put some more effort into your scummy posting).

I hate to see you die early, c_h, but it's the only way you'll learn...

[Reenk Roink]

I diagnose a severe case of casual scumminess, brought on by repeatedly getting away with it. The only cure is to lynch you until you start playing like a townie (or at least put some more effort into your scummy posting).

I hate to see you die early, c_h, but it's the only way you'll learn...

What is scummy about his post(s)? It bothers me when this characterization which is almost utterly meaningless is dropped as a way to justify a vote while not really justifying it at all. Better to just post a vote with nothing else, this makes it seem that you are trying too hard.

[TinCow]

What is scummy about his post(s)? It bothers me when this characterization which is almost utterly meaningless is dropped as a way to justify a vote while not really justifying it at all. Better to just post a vote with nothing else, this makes it seem that you are trying too hard.

Yes, these attempts at actual serious votes on Day 1 are odd. What's the point of Day 1 if not to vote based on humor and metagaming?

[Motep]

Hmmm...to change or not to change....

My gut is telling me things, but my head is telling me things else. Should I listen to reason, or should I listen to feeling?

[Reenk Roink]

Yes, these attempts at actual serious votes on Day 1 are odd. What's the point of Day 1 if not to vote based on humor and metagaming?

Are you implying that the seriousness of the vote has anything to do with the ontological status of guilt of the person being voted for?

Or perhaps you are implying this current case on classical_hero should even be considered serious. I don't consider "he put suspicion on Atpg but didn't vote so he is inconsistent, now allow me to add a word a subset of which is 'scum' to further justify my actions"

I will indulge you and consider it serious if you believe so, and so my response to it will be that classical_hero is throwing suspicion based on someone's voting patterns. Not exactly my cup of tea but OK, I consider it better than endorsing an average restaurant like Outback Steakhouse which ACIN is doing (quality used to be better but now the food is worse and the waitresses are less pretty).

[classical_hero]

Yes, these attempts at actual serious votes on Day 1 are odd. What's the point of Day 1 if not to vote based on humor and metagaming?

Exactly. I am surprised at how serious we have suddenly gotten on the first day. My finger of suspicion on ATPG was a joking one, since it is impossible to know exactly who is who on the first day.

@Motep. If your gut is telling you something, could it be indigestion?