Results 1 to 30 of 117

Thread: Separation of Science and State

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Separation of Science and State

    Quote Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy View Post
    Your troll powers are weak my young Padawan

    The scientist displays evidence which is then testable by someone else, this idea is then accepted until proven otherwise.

    The religious guy just says god told me and that's it.
    Paradigm blindness. Scientific "evidence" is provided and tested by the "scientific method". That is no different than religion, where religious evidence is presented and religious methods are used to test that evidence.

    Philosophically speaking they are equitably useless/useful.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member gaelic cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    mayo
    Posts
    4,833

    Default Re: Separation of Science and State

    Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla View Post
    Paradigm blindness. Scientific "evidence" is provided and tested by the "scientific method". That is no different than religion, where religious evidence is presented and religious methods are used to test that evidence.

    Philosophically speaking they are equitably useless/useful.
    unfortunately paradigm blindness would mean I have to accept there may be another method to figure out the world other than the scientific method.

    By your calculation it should be possible to build a church foundations, walls, roof etc etc by the religious method and trust it will stand up.
    They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
    a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.

    Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy

  3. #3
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Separation of Science and State

    they have been building houses walls and roofs thousands of years before there was anything that remotely looked like the scientific method.

    again science and the scientific method are something completely different than technology. though it is true that science is most dominant in the technological domain and nowadays technology is so dependent on science that they cant really be separated.

    We do not sow.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Senior Member gaelic cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    mayo
    Posts
    4,833

    Default Re: Separation of Science and State

    Quote Originally Posted by The Stranger View Post
    they have been building houses walls and roofs thousands of years before there was anything that remotely looked like the scientific method.

    again science and the scientific method are something completely different than technology. though it is true that science is most dominant in the technological domain and nowadays technology is so dependent on science that they cant really be separated.
    And yet only the scientific method can tell you why the church stands up the religious method has no such ability.

    Plus your not giving enough credit to the deductive powers of ancient peoples, just cos they may not have called it science does not mean they did not understand that different alloys gave differnt properties in casting.
    They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
    a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.

    Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy

  5. #5
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Separation of Science and State

    Quote Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy View Post
    And yet only the scientific method can tell you why the church stands up the religious method has no such ability.

    Plus your not giving enough credit to the deductive powers of ancient peoples, just cos they may not have called it science does not mean they did not understand that different alloys gave differnt properties in casting.
    it does so only you wouldnt believe it. and no it probably wouldnt provide empirical evidence, because that is the scientific method.

    deducing is part of the scientific method it is not solely the scientific method. so i dont see your point.
    Last edited by The Stranger; 02-13-2011 at 20:42.

    We do not sow.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Senior Member gaelic cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    mayo
    Posts
    4,833

    Default Re: Separation of Science and State

    Quote Originally Posted by The Stranger View Post

    deducing is part of the scientific method it is not solely the scientific method. so i dont see your point.
    Because your were trying to say that merely because people did not have Ipods and whatnot they must have thought buildings stood up because of god.

    People were easily smart enough to know that they stood up because they put mortar in between the stones and then built the stone courses up layer by layer.

    they did not call it science but they did have the evidence that could prove badly built walls fall down.
    They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
    a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.

    Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy

  7. #7
    Senior Member Senior Member Reenk Roink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4,353

    Default Re: Separation of Science and State

    That is one of the weirdest sites I have ever been to in my 5 seconds of browsing it. The fact that they didn't cite Feyerabend's Science in a Free Society also possibly hints that they might be ignorant of his work or have ripped off it.

  8. #8
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Separation of Science and State

    Quote Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy View Post
    Because your were trying to say that merely because people did not have Ipods and whatnot they must have thought buildings stood up because of god.

    People were easily smart enough to know that they stood up because they put mortar in between the stones and then built the stone courses up layer by layer.

    they did not call it science but they did have the evidence that could prove badly built walls fall down.
    -_- if you dont read what i write than there is no point in exchanging words.
    Last edited by The Stranger; 02-13-2011 at 21:58.

    We do not sow.

  9. #9
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Separation of Science and State

    This:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro View Post
    What are you talking about?

    When they measure something, it's evidence. It's provided by a ruler or a scale or a thermometer, not by the scientific method
    Is answered by this:

    Quote Originally Posted by The Stranger View Post
    it does so only you wouldnt believe it. and no it probably wouldnt provide empirical evidence, because that is the scientific method.

    deducing is part of the scientific method it is not solely the scientific method. so i dont see your point.
    Science measures, but measurement is not the only way of gaining information. In answer to why the Church stands up, it stands because all it's arcs were drawn in alignment and the stone is perfectly balanced, or as near as possible. Medieval architects understood form, but they didn't understand things like tensile strength and loadbearing supports. That's why medieval buildings look so different to modern ones, and personally I prefer them.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

  10. #10

    Default Re: Separation of Science and State

    Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla View Post
    Paradigm blindness. Scientific "evidence" is provided and tested by the "scientific method". That is no different than religion, where religious evidence is presented and religious methods are used to test that evidence.

    Philosophically speaking they are equitably useless/useful.
    What are you talking about?

    When they measure something, it's evidence. It's provided by a ruler or a scale or a thermometer, not by the scientific method

  11. #11
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Separation of Science and State

    Quote Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro View Post
    What are you talking about?

    When they measure something, it's evidence. It's provided by a ruler or a scale or a thermometer, not by the scientific method
    empirical evidence is different than per example logical evidence and empirical evidence is the (sole) ingredient of verification is scientific.

    We do not sow.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO