well? if you meet everyone's demand of culture, eventually the 7 culture slots won't be enough
BTW, after considering the facts, If you include Tibetan culture, you should as well include China, and then the map would be very2 large
well? if you meet everyone's demand of culture, eventually the 7 culture slots won't be enough
BTW, after considering the facts, If you include Tibetan culture, you should as well include China, and then the map would be very2 large
My Projects : * Near East Total War * Nusantara Total War * Assyria Total War *
* Watch the mind-blowing game : My Little Ponies : The Mafia Game!!! *
Also known as SPIKE in TWC
now, asia without china is not asia! I demand Asia!
with Chinese
HINT : Look at Tanit's post in ol AtB thread
"When the candles are out all women are fair."
-Plutarch, Coniugia Praecepta 46
Culture slot full; AtB Malaysia, Tibet and North China = EB eastern europe, faction slot full, possible landmass crash ratio, Asia meant from Anatolia to India (the known world), they didn't know what china was, uninfluential on the west, religion slot full, China and the subswquent regions that would come with it asks too many units, unnecesary regions would be put in place, etc.
Really, I'd rather have a EB: Han and not the Han in EB: AtB. Their diversity and military cannot be compiled into a few units and a lot of regions.
I hope I did not offend anyone, we want to have the whole world in the map if we could.
~Jirisys (Sadly... The real world is non-compatible with the landmass ratio of RTW![]()
)
Skullhead, it seems we have something in common, I have a proposal for this.....
Europa Barbarorum: Novus Ordo Mundi - Mod Leader Europa Barbarorum - Team Member
"To robbery, slaughter, plunder, they give the lying name of empire; they make a desert and call it peace." -CalgacusOriginally Posted by skullheadhq
Uhuh. Yep, it's not like they invented paper or anything. Uninfluential on the west, and you want to lead this project? Good luck.they didn't know what china was, uninfluential on the west,
EDIT: I mean "didn't know what china was". Roman and Chinese ambassadors actually met in Parthiain 146 BCbetween 123 and 88 BC:
.“The long reign of Mithadates II (123-87 B.C.) is significant [also] as in that during it Parthia first came into contact with both China and Rome.” - The Legacy of Persia, “Persia and the Ancient World” p.25
Last edited by Hax; 03-01-2011 at 17:20.
This space intentionally left blank.
So yea, Id like to hear how many culture slots the Indian Factions use :D :D :D :D :D
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
[21:16:17] [Gaius - 5.115.253.115]
i m not camping , its elegant strategy of waiting
Don't insult me. Yes, they were somewhat influential on the east... But how are you going to put it in an RTW mod and make that influence important at all? Besides some text description and everything, that's your case for Han China? Also, they didn't have a war with any western kingdom (except those who migrated there... i.e. the wusun?) and the records of westerners actually having known them is very late.
And what's our start date sweetie? 247 BCE Right? Besides it's parthia only... Meaning at this point (almost in the end of the time period) we would have actually 2 factions that knew about china! Oh my jolly! Really, even if you eliminate those two points, I have many more to not include Han china in it.
I have a vague historical account for both east of sogdiane, the arabian peninsula and the axum and below. Also my country's educational system doesn't really care for those cultures at all, so there's my bias.
EDIT:
One. Sadly the roman culture must be kept as they will be emergent.Originally Posted by LazyO
Armenian and Atrapatene have their own culture as well, no more arabian stereotype sounding spies... That was awful.
~Jirisys ()
Bookmarks