I'm fine with moral standards, but shouldn't that apply to things that are generally agreed-upon? Did she have sex with children? No. Did she steal or commit a crime? No. Was she hooking? No. Was she dishonest or otherwise deceptive? No.
Our society tolerates adult entertainment. In fact, porn consumption dollars are higher per capita in red/conservative states, so clearly there's a lot more than mere "toleration."
She broke no laws, and engaged in a widely supported and commercialized activity. Suspending or firing her is a freaking joke.
-edit-
P.S.: As far as "respect the parents' wishes", don't we draw a line on that when the parents' wishes infringe on the basic liberty of the teacher? For instance, I know quite a few ideologues in real life. Point of fact, I know two liberal loons and something like six reactionary right-wingers, all of whom I consider friends. These are the sorts of people who do not acknowledge the humanity or decency of anyone who disagrees with their political views. I'm sure they would not want a conservative or a liberal teaching their child, depending on their bent. Should those "values" be respected by suspending teachers who hold divergent values? This gets into a basic case of whose values infringe on whose liberties.
The teacher broke no laws. This seems inarguable to me.
Bookmarks