Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

    Classic would be nice Jun, but how many people are playing that compared to MM? Also I like the skill system, just wish classic mode had skills as well to finish off extra funds instead of tweaking out your army forever to spend it all.

    I was wrong after 4 MM 1vs1 I had to restart stw2 and close it using control+alt+delete, so that problem is still there. I guess somethings aren't fixable.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member Tomisama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,836

    Default Re: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

    Quote Originally Posted by AMP View Post
    Classic would be nice Jun, but how many people are playing that compared to MM? Also I like the skill system, just wish classic mode had skills as well to finish off extra funds instead of tweaking out your army forever to spend it all.
    You must be in Normal mode, not Classic mode AMP.

    I don't understand, Classic is completely ajustable, each unit has 10 skill and cost levels.

    For example:

    General ** (2 stars) - Unit strength 30
    Rank - ^ ^ ^ ^ o ^ ^ ^ ^
    Cost 300 350 405 465 530 600 675 725 840 930
    Morale 15 16 16 17 18 18 19 19 20 21
    Attack 14 15 16 17 18 18 19 20 20 21
    Defense 6 7 8 8 9 11 11 12 13 13
    Charge 15
    Armor 7

    Too bad it dosent work right.

    The SP Custom mode works fine, but the MP Classic (which is exactly the same) hangs since the patch (some maybe before).
    Last edited by Tomisama; 03-30-2011 at 20:52.
    HONOUR IS VICTORY - GO WITH HONOUR - KEEP THE CODE

    http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198003816474

  3. #3
    Banned ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Castle 2_5_2, Swissland.
    Posts
    0
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

    MP seems a bit better .

  4. #4

    Default Re: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

    Yes classic mode has honor upgrades, but I was hoping for skills like the avatar system. Why do I want to increase attack and defense on my missiles units? I like the option of tweaking and clan skill points would've been nice to have as well.

  5. #5
    Member Member DthB4Dishonor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New York City, USA
    Posts
    284

    Default Re: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

    MP is much more stable. The big question here is are long standing tournaments and leagues going to use the Classic Battle System or the MP Battle List Avatar system?

    P.S.EliteofKingWarman your inbox is full. Delete some stuff so I can send PM.
    Also Known As: RTKPaul
    "I dont want you to die for your country, no poor son of a bitch ever won a war by dying for his country, he won it by making the other poor son of a bitch die for his country"- George S. Patton

  6. #6
    Member Member UglyJun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Byron Bay
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

    what i cant believe is that the basic mp part the classic has been neglected totally and is unplayable right now ?
    Amp would be nice to combine the 2 modes regarding the tweaking :)
    Last edited by UglyJun; 04-01-2011 at 07:20.
    UglyJun
    never born never died 黒い山

  7. #7
    Rolluplover Member Kocmoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,563
    Blog Entries
    9

    Default Re: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

    As mentioned in another tread already, the classic mod as it is right now is almost unplayable. Heavy lags, colors and the way you have to choose units is not good.
    Unless CA patch this ( they hardly will work on this, before the "normal" MM-way is working properly) I cant imagine that we play classic at all.

    There is much to patch still. If you look at all the balancing issues.... its so much. Bugs everywhere, UI is not good as well, maps are bugged.
    Since CA seems to work only on the stability right now, I cant even imagine when we ever will see patches sorting out other problems.
    2 weeks gone now and time is running, I was pretty nice after the first week and the quick patch, but now I start to worry a bit.

    I miss the long goals, which cant be only the MM (actual you still have to reset game a lot) and some gameplay issues which seems to me also very important.

    1. artillery problems - I mentioned my "artillery button", which would allow artillery, if both sides click on the button, else no arty
    2. 22k, we need a much lower max fund, most people seems to agree about 10-12k, also add smaller steps from 5-10k
    3. moral penalties for flanking, rearing
    4. Ability Timer & CD and a better description of retainer and what the effects actual are
    5. turn the moral penalties on, since you took em off (or made them extreme low)


    Point 1 & 2 are so high important, It should get fixed within 1 week.

  8. #8

    Default Re: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

    Quote Originally Posted by Tomisama View Post
    The SP Custom mode works fine, but the MP Classic (which is exactly the same) hangs since the patch (some maybe before).
    Not completely the same. I noticed that the SP custom mode has an adjustable funds option while the MP one does not.

  9. #9
    Rolluplover Member Kocmoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,563
    Blog Entries
    9

    Default Re: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

    Im sure, that flanking and rearing wont get activated anymore. The problem is, that once units are in fight and bunched up (bubble-gum-units), there will always be "something" in the rear or on the flank.

    If flanking and rearing should ever get back into the game, than we will see much more clustered units in the first place, so you can actual clearly say, where on earth the back of a unit is.
    More clustered units means, that the looking of the game will be less attractive. Im sure CA did invest a lot of time to make all this units act like they do right now.

    This sais, Im in heavy doubts that we will see more clustered units and this means, that we wont see rearing or flanking back at all. That rearing/flanking is off, I call almost a fact (cant be 100% sure, but i hardly doubt it)

    One problem I see today is, that I only see full stat-numbers, If you look at a unit with mouseover and look at moral, attack.... You see full numbers, there are no 5,5 or something. I think, that the penalties will work the same way, they probably use full number. There are hidden moral penalties, mostly seen on the "bar" on the flag of the unit and shown numbers in the mouseover info.

    I wrote about my tests in other treads already, to make it short:

    1. You can do masstests, by moving one unit close to 10 of the enemy, you see the flag-bar droping and a low moral unit will waver, it wont run! Its the outnumber factor, in old days it was 1:10 and 1:100. I believe its still the same today.

    2. If you now move a unit in the rear of this one unit, you wont see any different, same goes for the flank.

    3. now test all the other things, we got a wavering unit, almost routing and rearing does nothing, flanking does nothing, "scaring enemies" does nothing, whistling arrow does nothing...
    Every single moral penalty in game, does nothing at all!

    Simple tests, you can do by yourself, try to fatigue the unit and so on.

    Im sure, most things are taken off, so far only kill and quick kill drop moral, same as gen not around or many units dead in army, not to mention killed gen.



    What really makes me going mad is the fact, that CA doesnt share any information. They tell us, that they are aware of our issues, bringing second patch, which change almost nothing apart from ladder and coward.
    I still have to restart game all the time, client mistakes, resets and so on...

    Some things will take time to fix, but to change 22k and artillery is a matter of one day or even less!


    They could argue, that they dont use so many moral penalties to make it easyer for new player, but honestly.... we saw 200+ in most channels the first week, now we are below 30 in most channels, most of the new player are gone soon. While we are left, with a bad ladder, bad clancampaign (Id like to challange other clans and not the 300+ player who lose twice as much as winning), not working MM, not working classic mod, chrashing game, games where we see 4:0 or 3:1, with bald balance, arty allowed, too high funds, bad designed moral, bugged cav, bugged missles, bugged maps, border bugs, movement bugs, terrible designed stats.... I could continue...

    Most of us keeps playing because they hope that CA will fix it. If they would say: "no, we never will get more moral penalties back" or "we wont fix most of the things" or "22k will keep into the game" or "artillery wont get removed".... than many of us would stop playing.

  10. #10
    Member Member UglyJun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Byron Bay
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

    ok all we ask for to give us back stw with new graphics engine and some a little extras . what we got is acrcade crap with kushafuden. and the basic mp is broken why are they going backwards stw was good. the moral flanking all the stuff u cant manage in stw2 i cant understand what they where thinking ????
    UglyJun
    never born never died 黒い山

  11. #11

    Default Re: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

    Wait wait. I obviously haven't been paying enough attention, but are you saying that the morale hit from flanking and encirclement is gone?

  12. #12
    Rolluplover Member Kocmoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,563
    Blog Entries
    9

    Default Re: March 29th MP Patch seems to be an improvement

    Quote Originally Posted by quadalpha View Post
    Wait wait. I obviously haven't been paying enough attention, but are you saying that the morale hit from flanking and encirclement is gone?
    Yes, thats exactly what Im saying!

    There are a few additional information to this:

    1. It is possible that rearing and flanking is still around, but than it is extremely low (this means that we speak about 0,* numbers)
    2. It is possible that certain moral penalties are not cumulative and only the highest penalty is taken

    To give you a picture:

    Since outnumber effects are still there (1:10 and 1:100) you can put the lowest moral unit next to 20 enemy units.
    The missle will drop moral (you can see it at the bar) and even start to waver, now if other moral penalties would have any effect, the unit should rout at some point, right?

    I placed one of the 20 unit in the back of this wavering unit, one on the flank. We got scare enemy next to it, whistling arrows and a monk with warcry. Guess what...
    Nothing happened!

    The 2 points mentioned above show you what can be possible.

    If just the highest penalty is taken, than the outnumber effect will be stronger as any other penalty, so you wont see rearing having any effect.


    Now I personal think its number 1, since you can put 2 units in rear and flank and nothing happens to the moral bar on the unit flag!


    Im almost sure, that its taken off completely, online you can already say, that flanking and rearing is pointless. Rearing has only one effect, and thats a higher killingspeed.
    The game is done to killingspeed, nothing else. Apart from a few moral effect, such as gen dies or gen not in range, rally.... there is no real moral anymore.

    The tests I described you can easy redo yourself.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO