Battlefield Bad Company 2

[naut]

Bump. Is this a game worth getting. I have mates who play, but Yatzee was less than complementary about it. So.....

[Drunk Clown]

Bump. Is this a game worth getting. I have mates who play, but Yatzee was less than complementary about it. So.....

Yes!

Especially if it's 20 euro's (about 27 aud) like here.

In no time you'll hit the 50 hours, especially with mates.

[ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88]

My game is laggy as hell for me. Think I need to tone down my settings?

[Drunk Clown]

My game is laggy as hell for me. Think I need to tone down my settings?

All the time?

[Monk]

Bump. Is this a game worth getting. I have mates who play, but Yatzee was less than complementary about it. So.....

Yatzee's reviews are more of a novelty than anything. Trusting any "angry" reviewer for a total picture of the final product is dubious at best.

Find a decent server that has an active admin team and you'll have some fun. The game's got a hacker problem, but what battlefield game doesn't?

[naut]

Yatzee's reviews are more of a novelty than anything. Trusting any "angry" reviewer for a total picture of the final product is dubious at best.

Find a decent server that has an active admin team and you'll have some fun. The game's got a hacker problem, but what battlefield game doesn't?

Having met Yatzee, I know that his reviews are largely hyperbole. But, if he doesn't like a game, he means it. His main view is that there is no such thing as the perfect game, he basically acts out the opposite of a "fanboi".

I don't want to sink 20 bucks into a game I will barely play. For example, I bought L4D2 on the back of L4D1, haven't played it once, it's that rubbish (Aussie version) and it cost me, while not much in the scheme of things, $20. But, I bought Killing Floor + DLC for $5, I've played 50 hours with mates in no time. Basically, on principle, I don't want a repeat of that. Or should I wait for BF3?

[Monk]

Oh without a doubt he is 100% sincere, but his standards are so incredibly high sometimes it's almost a self-parody. A game doesn't need to be an art-house shooter to be good for instance, and BC2 is definitely not that.

Though I'll gladly admit the initial release state of the game was terrible. Bugged up and nearly hopeless in online play. These days its become a very respectable title and a worthy online shooter. You say you've got friends who play it, well you're in luck since BC2 is played best with 2-3 friends. The game is practically designed around squad based combat, so if you were to play with people and work together I'm sure you'd have at least a little bit of fun.

[naut]

Though I'll gladly admit the initial release state of the game was terrible. Bugged up and nearly hopeless in online play. These days its become a very respectable title and a worthy online shooter. You say you've got friends who play it, well you're in luck since BC2 is played best with 2-3 friends. The game is practically designed around squad based combat, so if you were to play with people and work together I'm sure you'd have at least a little bit of fun.

Cheers. What's the bet I get it and a month later it's 75% off on a random Steam sale.

[Veho Nex]

I'll put 50 gold coins down on the fact that you will buy it and a week later EA will announce that BC2 is now F2P

[Prussian to the Iron]

Bump. Is this a game worth getting. I have mates who play, but Yatzee was less than complementary about it. So.....

I love it personally. I don't know how good it is on PC though.

But my advice? wait a few months. Battlefield 3 is out October 25th, and it looks AMAZING. i'm pre-ordering soon.

[Jolt]

I love it personally. I don't know how good it is on PC though.

But my advice? wait a few months. Battlefield 3 is out October 25th, and it looks AMAZING. i'm pre-ordering soon.

Bleh. Looks exactly like every other CoD that has appeared in the last 5 years.

[Alexander the Pretty Good]

Bleh. Looks exactly like every other CoD that has appeared in the last 5 years.

Looks. It also looks like BF2 with a lot of shine applied. I trust them with the MP.

[Prussian to the Iron]

Bleh. Looks exactly like every other CoD that has appeared in the last 5 years.

I definitely do not agree with this. Battlefield is nothing like CoD, except maybe the fact that you shoot people. The entire gameplay is different, and the fact that CoD hasn't changed since CoD 4 means that it's easy to contrast. The differences are glaring, not only gameplay wise, but graphically as well. MW3 looks nowhere close to the visual quality of BF3.

[Hooahguy]

I definitely do not agree with this. Battlefield is nothing like CoD, except maybe the fact that you shoot people. The entire gameplay is different, and the fact that CoD hasn't changed since CoD 4 means that it's easy to contrast. The differences are glaring, not only gameplay wise, but graphically as well. MW3 looks nowhere close to the visual quality of BF3.

Agreed 100%.

Im just missing the whole commander aspect that other BF games had.

[Prussian to the Iron]

Agreed 100%.

Im just missing the whole commander aspect that other BF games had.

I wish I could really understand why everybody wants the commander so badly

[Hooahguy]

I wish I could really understand why everybody wants the commander so badly

Because it gives a grand strategical aspect to the game. I remember in BF2142, when we had a good commander that is, we would divide into squads and the commander would devise a strategy on how to win the match. He would be able to talk to squad commanders and give them orders. You really felt like you were part of a larger thing. In BC2 it was a bunch of squads running around trying to get to the objective.
In short, a commander makes things more organized.