It's a surprise mafia [Concluded]

[TheLastDays]

Well don't you have anything to say?

[Secura]

Post more, we need you if town.

This is a fair point, though I'm unsure whether you're merely trying to encourage me into posting more or you're actually implying that I might be lurking, which I abhor and wouldn't resort to were I town or scum.

Anyway, I'm going to vote: classical_hero today.

Your vote feels a little lazy and seems to lack any real conviction this time around; you accuse GH of being disruptive to the town's cause, but he only seems so because you're allowing his behaviour to distract you.

Lynching GH isn't going to result in him revealing his reasons for the Blackadder lynch, and in a game with no reveals we only have Blackadder's word that he was innocent, which begs the question of what you hope to achieve by lynching GH? Heck, I'd also like to know what it is that GH would have to gain by getting Blackadder lynched when he could've employed that tactic against someone like Renata or Romanic?

[Believer]

This is a fair point, though I'm unsure whether you're merely trying to encourage me into posting more or you're actually implying that I might be lurking, which I abhor and wouldn't resort to were I town or scum.

No mistress, I would never dare! Please don't hurt Believer. Believer good!

Your vote feels a little lazy and seems to lack any real conviction this time around; you accuse GH of being disruptive to the town's cause, but he only seems so because you're allowing his behaviour to distract you.

You got me by the balls here. I have nothing good, that's why I'm poking better players for something.

Lynching GH isn't going to result in him revealing his reasons for the Blackadder lynch, and in a game with no reveals we only have Blackadder's word that he was innocent, which begs the question of what you hope to achieve by lynching GH? Heck, I'd also like to know what it is that GH would have to gain by getting Blackadder lynched when he could've employed that tactic against someone like Renata or Romanic?

Perhaps. I was considering the fact that he might be bluffing. Obviously he wasn't, or he's too cool to give it away to some pressure.
I lack good initiative in this game, I want something tangible but can't seem to grasp at it. Give me something to shoot!

[Secura]

You got me by the balls here. I have nothing good, that's why I'm poking better players for something.

My comments after the vote were aimed at classical_hero, not you! :3

[Diamondeye]

Vote: Believer.

[TheLastDays]

unvote, vote: classical_hero

[Believer]

My comments after the vote were aimed at classical_hero, not you! :3

I stand by my balls and your grip of them.

Vote: Believer.

Sup?

[Ibn-Khaldun]

Well don't you have anything to say?

Actualy, no. This is not exactly the usual mafia game and I'm really confused.

[Diamondeye]

Sup?

I just did, thank you very much.

[Ibn-Khaldun]

Vote: Major Robert Dump

I still think he is guilty.

[Major Robert Dump]

No.

Vote: Believer

Because he is in a cult

[GeneralHankerchief]

Since that's a pretty definitive statement:

Vote: Believer


Askthepizzaguy rules!

[Believer]

I just did, thank you very much.

I think the forum rules dictate that we both speak and interpret in English, my nordic friend. :)

Why vote me? (The same goes for MJD and GH)

[Romanic]

No.

Vote: Believer

Because he is in a cult

Do you know this for a fact?

[Romanic]

I don't understand this from you TheLastDays:

vote: Ibn-Khaldun

say something...

What do you want me to say?

Well don't you have anything to say?

unvote, vote: classical_hero

How are you satisfied enough with Ibn's answer to unvote him?

The "don't you have anything to say?" implies that Ibn should have something to say, and you're right, he should have, if he's looking for scum. But then you simply unvote him before he answers.

Plus you're now voting classical_hero without giving a reason. Why?

vote: TheLastDays

I might switch to Believer if MRD's answer is satisfactory, but I ain't going to follow another "hidden claim" like GH's, not coming from MRD anyway, after I've seen the mess he made in ATPG Mafia 2.

[Believer]

After scummy conversations in private and even scummier dark-alley transactions I have decided upon the following.

Unvote;
Vote: TheLastDays

[Diamondeye]

I think the forum rules dictate that we both speak and interpret in English, my nordic friend. :)

Sup: To take or drink in swallows or gulps.
Chiefly dialect: to take food and especially liquid food into the mouth a little at a time.

Why vote me? (The same goes for MJD and GH)

The same reason I've voted you before; You're hiding in the skirts of others (Secura!).

[Believer]

Sup: To take or drink in swallows or gulps.
Chiefly dialect: to take food and especially liquid food into the mouth a little at a time.

The same reason I've voted you before; You're hiding in the skirts of others (Secura!).

Ah. That's about what it means in Swedish aswell, I thought you were responding at that.

I'm not hiding anything. I'm trying to come up with something but I can't, so I'm poking someone for activity for the benefit of the town. I'm posting at all hours and people are free to ask me about anything. I'm being completely open.

[Populus Romanus]

Believer, you had PM conversation with TheLastDays?

vote: TheLast Days

[TheLastDays]

After scummy conversations in private and even scummier dark-alley transactions I have decided upon the following.

Unvote;
Vote: TheLastDays

So is that an OMGUS for last vote on you or for Music Mafia? Or the joining of an argument by yet someone else in Romanic?

unvote, vote: Believer

How are you satisfied enough with Ibn's answer to unvote him?

The "don't you have anything to say?" implies that Ibn should have something to say, and you're right, he should have, if he's looking for scum. But then you simply unvote him before he answers.

Plus you're now voting classical_hero without giving a reason. Why?

It's not so much about being completely satisfied with an answer than about getting a bunch of answers. Sometimes unvoting someone can be as effective as voting for them, I got my answer after I unvoted him. You're right, he should have an answer. That he doesn't have an answer is also an answer.

Plus, I wanted to support Secura's argument by putting more pressure on classical_hero and since I was at work I wasn't sure when I'd be able to post again. Unfortunately he hasn't answered, although pressured.

Now I'd like to know why you seem so intent to critique my votes? IMO they make sense and I'm trying to do something at least.

Believer, you had PM conversation with TheLastDays?

No, he did not. That's another GH-like argument he's pulling off there.

[Romanic]

Now I'd like to know why you seem so intent to critique my votes? IMO they make sense and I'm trying to do something at least.

I've said why I critique your vote:

1) Your vote on Ibn is fine, but the unvote is strange, given his answer.
2) Your vote on CH was unexplained.

But if you were asking why I critique your votes then I'll reply that I am looking for scumbags. What kind of question is that anyway?

As for why Believer moved his vote, I asked him to, to pressure you, and also see how he would react. I can't say that I liked his reaction, as he started on the defensive, stating that I might be a cultist trying to trick him, but he eventually did it. As far as I'm concerned, you two are satisfactory lynches for now.

And I'm still waiting for MRD's explanation *tap* *tap*

[Romanic]

Tally time perhaps?

4 Believer (Diamondeye, Major Robert Dump, GeneralHankerchief, TheLastDays)
3 TheLastDays (Romanic, Believer, Populus Romanus)
1 GeneralHankerchief (classical_hero)
1 classical_hero (Secura)
1 Major Robert Dump (Ibn Khaldun)
---
4 not voting (ArpeggiateTHIS, Renata, robbiecon, Seon)

[Populus Romanus]

So he was lying about the PMs? Then I shall put another nail in his coffin. unvote; vote: believer

[Major Robert Dump]

I don't have an explanation. We lynch people in cults, therefore, when I decide to lynch someone, I will say I think they are in a cult. There is nothing I have on Believer that I don't have on every other person in this game, as I can't scan, haven't had PMs with people and haven't been recruited (yet). Based on the timeframe and number of night, each cult should have had 3-4 people now if they started with just one, assume 1 or two have been lynched, that means town is greatly outnumbered right now.

so yeah, Believer is in a cult.

[Major Robert Dump]

Black September. Our main goal is to assassinate Franz Ferdinand and liberate the glorious nation of Serbia.



I had no suspects at all.

See, he even says so here

[Believer]

So he was lying about the PMs? Then I shall put another nail in his coffin. unvote; vote: believer

I haven't lied about anything. Refer to this by Romanic:

As for why Believer moved his vote, I asked him to, to pressure you, and also see how he would react. I can't say that I liked his reaction, as he started on the defensive, stating that I might be a cultist trying to trick him, but he eventually did it. As far as I'm concerned, you two are satisfactory lynches for now.

I never stated that I was in contact with TLD.

We lynch people in cults.

so yeah, Believer is in a cult.

Seeing the rules of the game, cultists should be the best townies around. If you suspect someone is a cultist you can be pretty clear that person is your best friend, since he will most likely be gunning for his own cult leader.
Why?
Once his leader is dead he will revert back to his original town alignment. Looking at this setup it's easy to see that a town victory is easier than a cult victory. So no, I don't think we should lynch people because they are cultists. Cult leaders, definately.
With all this said and your logic flawed; I am not a cultist and neither am I a cult leader.

[Seon]

I come here and I am not yet dead. This must mean Renata must be a cultist, for she would never allow me to die. Vote: Renny

[Askthepizzaguy]

Time up. Allow me to get settled, do a tally, and advance the round.

[Askthepizzaguy]

DAY FOUR




The assembled peasants grumbled at their shoddy treatment, and began accusing one another of being a heretic. The discussion was light. People seemed to be pointing fingers without much reason. But soon, a large group pointed their fingers at one man. And that man was a Believer.

A Believer in what? Voodoo? Faeries? Love at first sight? Or perhaps he was a Believer in some foul, dastardly, un-Pizzalike religion!


Askthepizzaguy: "Is this him? Is this the guy?"


Several folks looked at GeneralHankerchief, who nodded.


General Hanky: "General says Believer is guilty."


Believer: "I'm not a heretic, I'm not a heretic! I'm a true Believer!"


Askthepizzaguy: "It doesn't matter, Believer man! It doesn't matter! For you have crossed the line, and defied the word of Generalissimo Francisco Frankerchief!"


Major Robert Dump: "Actually, now they're playing Major Robert Dump says."


Askthepizzaguy: "Are they? Are they? Or are you just a puppet of the General, an underling, sent in his stead? Will you die in the line of duty, just like the Captain before you? And where did you all get these military ranks? You're just a bunch of silly wheat farmers! I'm out of it for a little while and everybody gets delusions of grandeur!"







Major Robert Dump: "................Dump says he's guilty! DUMP! DUMP! DUMP!!"



And so, the crowd grabbed Believer, and dumped him unceremoniously in the wheat thresher.


Askthepizzaguy: "Ok.... meeting adjourned. Back to bed, peasants!"




Alive:

ArpeggiateTHIS
Classical_hero
Diamondeye
GeneralHankerchief
Ibn-Khaldun
Major Robert Dump
Populus Romanus
Renata
Robbiecon
Romanic
Secura
Seon
TheLastDays


Dead:

issaikhaan- Far, far too pretty for the likes of you

Captain Blackadder- Permanently cured of headaches
Mr. Stuka- Boom, boom, boom.... even brighter than the moon, moon, moon.

Believer- Died going against the grain.


This round will end in 24 hours, please remember to send in orders. I'll grant an extension if necessary.





NIGHT FOUR

[Major Robert Dump]

I am a virgin