Would have decided to head back on my previous feeling and vote Chaotix.
As for Andres, he's definitely hiding something, which can be interpreted however you would like, and his claim could just as easily be conveniently forged.
In any case, the write up (a quick glance show's he's probably getting lynched) should provide at least a minute indication.
Post Preview: Oh there's a tally, correction, Andres IS getting lynched.
You cannot add days to life but you can add life to days.
Would have decided to head back on my previous feeling and vote Chaotix.
As for Andres, he's definitely hiding something, which can be interpreted however you would like, and his claim could just as easily be conveniently forged.
In any case, the write up (a quick glance show's he's probably getting lynched) should provide at least a minute indication.
Post Preview: Oh there's a tally, correction, Andres IS getting lynched.
Alright, I'm down for saving my cultbuddy. Would prefer the votes to go to Chaotix but we can save that for next round.
Unvote: Chaotix
Vote: Warman
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
Originally Posted by TosaInu
At times I read back my own posts [...]. It's not always clear at first glance.
Originally Posted by ELITEKWARMAN8GINGYBREADMENMILK
I make a simple joke and everyone wants me dead?
They're called cultists. Townies who wanted to change bandwagons and not go after Andres would still go for a real suspect like TLD and not a random probable townie. However, if several are cultists they don't care who dies as long as it's not their ally, so the most convenient bandwagon they can find works.
Even if the reviver is town, that doesn't mean Andres isn't be a cultist except by his own not-to-be-trusted word - he says he died a cultist, could have just been revived and still a cultist with the reviver not affecting that picture. For all his inaccurate ranting about town networks he's clearly not acted in favor of the town. There's absolutely no excuse for not telling everyone immediately after he was revived what he knew about cult activity.
Originally Posted by Zack
I didn't realize I was so persuasive!
One of the abilities of being a cult leader is it not? Or do you have some other explanation you still owe us for dodging abilities used on you and surviving a night attack?
There was a big high wall there that tried to stop me
Sign was painted, it said private property
But on the back side it didn't say nothing
This land was made for you and me
They're called cultists. Townies who wanted to change bandwagons and not go after Andres would still go for a real suspect like TLD and not a random probable townie. However, if several are cultists they don't care who dies as long as it's not their ally, so the most convenient bandwagon they can find works.
Even if the reviver is town, that doesn't mean Andres isn't be a cultist except by his own not-to-be-trusted word - he says he died a cultist, could have just been revived and still a cultist with the reviver not affecting that picture. For all his inaccurate ranting about town networks he's clearly not acted in favor of the town. There's absolutely no excuse for not telling everyone immediately after he was revived what he knew about cult activity.
One of the abilities of being a cult leader is it not? Or do you have some other explanation you still owe us for dodging abilities used on you and surviving a night attack?
One of the abilities of being a cult leader is it not? Or do you have some other explanation you still owe us for dodging abilities used on you and surviving a night attack?
Sorry, but how do you explain Zack's vote on Andres then? Remember Sack's vote was the second after Beskars, also did you note who voted for Sack?
Sorry, but how do you explain Zack's vote on Andres then? Remember Sack's vote was the second after Beskars, also did you note who voted for Sack?
You seem to be mistaken about something, because neither Zack nor Andres have recently placed any meaningful pro-town votes or votes against each other. Solitary votes against someone with no chance of being lynched or a vote that is soon unvoted again are extremely common scum distancing tactics.
On the other hand, Zack has been on an awful lot of bandwagons to "save" people that end up lynching townies. Save TLD to lynch Arjos, a townie. Save Diamondeye to lynch Seon, a townie. Trying to save Andres today without any case on Warman. And I think we'd all just want an explanation for what he is, as a likely non-town power role, that's common sense even if he's not cult.
There was a big high wall there that tried to stop me
Sign was painted, it said private property
But on the back side it didn't say nothing
This land was made for you and me
As much as I hate rescue bandwagons, I'd have to agree with Zack that Warman's last few posts have been really, really scummy.
Unvote, Vote: Warman
If voting was still open, I would change and vote choxorn. All his posts have either been jokes, meaningless, fluff, or all three:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Originally Posted by Choxorn
A preist and a rabbi walk into a bar. The preist says "ouch," and the bartender says "What is this, a joke?"
Originally Posted by Choxorn
Vote: GeneralHandkerchief, at the bidding of the Random Number God.
Originally Posted by Choxorn
Unless you have a game with a lot of mafias and lynch immunities- I've seen a couple with more anti-townies being lynched than townies. (I'm looking at you, Camikaze's LOTR game)
Oh, and sorry for not being around yesterday, my internet decided to be a and disconnected while I was reading the thread, and then I forgot about it.
Originally Posted by Choxorn
I love this thread so much.
Originally Posted by Choxorn
Chaotix, Fluffy does not ragequit games. Games ragequit Fluffy.
Originally Posted by Choxorn
It's 14 if "Boo-yeah" is 2 words, 13 if it's only one word.
Or jumping on a bandwagon for people that are "scummy", with no other explanation, or "good case!" given:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Originally Posted by Choxorn
I don't have time to read through the past 5 pages, so I'll just Vote: TheLastDays for his general scummy atmosphere.
Originally Posted by Choxorn
I still think that Vote: TheLastDays is scummy.
Originally Posted by Choxorn
Vote: TheLastDays, because we should have killed him a long time ago.
Originally Posted by Choxorn
Vote: TheLastDays
Originally Posted by Choxorn
This is the best case I've seen so far.
Unvote, Vote: glyphz
Originally Posted by Choxorn
It appears the dark sword killer struck again tonight. Seeing as he wasn't Renata...
Vote: glyphz, unless he was roleblocked again.
Originally Posted by Choxorn
Unvote, Vote: TLD
Because I still think that nobody should be allowed to act as scummy as he has and not be lynched.
Even though he hadn't been voting TLD for awhile.
Originally Posted by Choxorn
Vote: TheLastDays
No, I still haven't given up on this.
Originally Posted by Choxorn
As much as I hate rescue bandwagons, I'd have to agree with Zack that Warman's last few posts have been really, really scummy.
Unvote, Vote: Warman
Or not really helpful, but not necessarily meaningless comments:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Originally Posted by Choxorn
I... wait, what? Why? Where did this Believer-wagon come from? Why should I vote for him, anyway?
Originally Posted by Choxorn
If I thought that voting for TLD was scummy, why would I be doing it?
Nose of Suspicion: Khazaar
Originally Posted by Choxorn
Well.... not really, no, I don't have much new points to add aside from his scumminess early in the game. At the point, I'm mostly just voting him on my "he's still too scummy to still be alive" principle when I don't see anyone better to vote for.
For instance, I still don't get why the case on Andres is a good one, but maybe that's just because I don't know what's going on behind-the-scenes.
Or an isolated vote on someone, whom he thinks there is a valid case against (and the only time it's his own case, and not someone else's), yet never saying another word about that person:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Originally Posted by Choxorn
Unvote, Vote: johnhughthom
This is the second day in a row you made a vote near the end of the day to join a sudden end-of-day bandwagon that sprouted from almost nowhere, and I'm getting a scummy vibe from you. Care to explain that?
Well, I didn't follow up because I was focusing on other things (like TLD and glyphz and whatever the heck else was going on). I think at one point someone connected glyphz to jht, and I ended up deciding that since glyphz was a probable town by that point, there might not be anything wrong with jht's voting.
On the other hand, the existence of this cult changes things a bit. I had no idea there was one until Andres mentioned it. I think I'll have to look at that case again.
I haven't been paying enough attention to notice some of those things. For that matter, most of the things you've listed are just what I usually do when I'm a townie that doesn't know what's going on and isn't paying enough attention. Come on, you've played enough games with me to know I don't act like this when I'm mafia.
You seem to be mistaken about something, because neither Zack nor Andres have recently placed any meaningful pro-town votes or votes against each other. Solitary votes against someone with no chance of being lynched or a vote that is soon unvoted again are extremely common scum distancing tactics.
On the other hand, Zack has been on an awful lot of bandwagons to "save" people that end up lynching townies. Save TLD to lynch Arjos, a townie. Save Diamondeye to lynch Seon, a townie. Trying to save Andres today without any case on Warman. And I think we'd all just want an explanation for what he is, as a likely non-town power role, that's common sense even if he's not cult.
Ok, I follow you but do you understand everybody except you is lacking that common sense right now? The townies who followed warman's bandwagon without any reason could have well joined and contributed against a Zack's bandwagon if any of them were a bit suspicious of him.
Warman is the guy everyone wants to lynch, but it would be a waste of a lynch to lynch him.
Need some one with a misdirect...
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
Warman is the guy everyone wants to lynch, but it would be a waste of a lynch to lynch him.
Yes, it seems like both sides are at an empasse really; the town really shouldn't be wasting a lynch on him at this stage and the mafia probably don't want to use a kill on someone who isn't a threat to them.
"Blacker than a moonless night. Hotter and more bitter than Hell itself… that is coffee."
Bookmarks