
Originally Posted by
Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
"Above the physical" might be better, the assumption that the world has a concrete "phyiscal" reality is metaphysical.
"Punish as you would like to be punished" - what if I would not punish someone for child rape? Does that mean I should not be punished, is that Just?
I blame C.S. Lewis for the "Golden Rule", he is th earliest proponent I can trace, no doubt he thought it was a way to make Christianity palatable to the masses (it was in his book "Mere Christianity") - crucially, Lewis was a firm believer in "Natural Law" which is basically the same thing as "natural" Justice.
None the less, as it has been populasied by Karen Armstrong it is a completely relativistic and therefore worthless statement.
The actual "Golden Rule" is:
Love the Lord your God with all your Hear and all your Mind and all your Soul, and Love your Neighbour as Youself.
That is not a relativistic statement, it is unequivical and a much better Creed to live your life by. If You don't like the "beardy" God by all means substitue Einstien's/Spinoza's and the import is preserved.
Bookmarks