Is it really surprising that there are emotional rants against the man?
It has been 145 years but there is still great bitterness on the part of many people in Georgia, Alabama, and the Carolinas.
His own words and attitudes are not enough? You do not wish to take the man at his word during the war but in his recollections he has in an understated way admitted that his men wrecked violence and murder, though he shies from the rape charges by that time and in a more civil environment.
Of course, postwar he was head of the army and we see his policies at work against the Indian Nations of the plains and west coast.
Does anyone doubt that there were atrocities committed against the Indian Nations?
These were often against tribes and bands who were at peace the US.
Was this something new, or was it a continuation of policies first employed against the south?
Bookmarks