The armies that were sent to Greece constituted about half of the total Persian armed forces, IIRC.A ground force of hundreds of thousands and a navy of hundreds of ships isn't a trivial amount.
The armies that were sent to Greece constituted about half of the total Persian armed forces, IIRC.A ground force of hundreds of thousands and a navy of hundreds of ships isn't a trivial amount.
This space intentionally left blank.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Naturally, but it was not just a minor matter, it was a punitive expedition. However, it should be realised that the Persians were very much capable of crushing the Greeks. There were simply other things that did not allow them to do so at the time.There you go. One doesn't commit half of one's military resources to resolve such a minor matter.
This space intentionally left blank.
Well, if Syracuse sided decisively with the Greeks, maybe not even the full Persian force would not have been able to defeat the Greeks. And other such hypotheticals.
My point was that we shouldn't diminish the importance of the war in the Persian perspective, even if it was (much) greater in the eyes of the Greeks.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Bookmarks