Results 1 to 30 of 57

Thread: AOR systems, and the historical vs the realistic

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #12
    urk! Member bobbin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tin Isles
    Posts
    3,668

    Default Re: AOR systems, and the historical vs the realistic

    From what I can tell the recruitment limits for the Romans was a product of having to draw a line somewhere to prevent (like Tellos said) the EDB code ballooning to unworkable sizes. It would have been perfectly possible for the Romans to raise legions in Scotland (excluding the highlands and west coast which were just too sparsely populated for that) and Mesoptamia, it was just that historically they never were never in control of those regions for long enough to do so.

    Quote Originally Posted by Arjos View Post
    Beyond Dacia, simply could have never happened; the Kimmerios Bosporos would be just too isolated and culturally developed to be romanized; in Arabia and Mesopotamia the Romani tried and tried, but I don't see how anything other than local rulers could be implemented...
    The Bosporos area did become Romanised eventually and was even a Roman province for a short time. Its status as a client kingdom for most of its time under Rome was more down to the whim of the Emperor's than any real barrier to incorporation.
    Last edited by bobbin; 12-26-2011 at 18:59.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO