Well, that and a significant shift toward the Soviet Union, known in the West as Finlandization. For all intents and purposes, Finland had to become a Soviet satellite in its foreign policy.
I don't think that's fair. Sarmation knows his military history, and he's right. The Soviets could have defeated Finland in '45. In fact, the Soviets could have beaten the Finns in '40. The Finnish military certainly presented a speedbump to Soviet plans, but the real reason Finland remained independent in both instances was because it gave Stalin what he wanted at the same time that he had more pressing priorites.Originally Posted by PVC
Bookmarks