With Great Sacrifice [Concluded]

**LazyMcCrow** · 03-03-2012, 19:56

Reads to me like Yaropolk may have been a mafia killed by an SK. Not much in the thread to indicate who may look more innocent/guilty if that were the case. I've had a big problem with GeneralHankerchief's super-townie posts, but I don't know his playing style and that may just mean he IS a super townie. But anyway, the exchange with Atheotes after the first day indicates a high degree of confidence that he will get to the endgame. Nothing else tingling my spideys right now so vote: GeneralHankerchief

**Montmorency** · 03-03-2012, 19:59

Originally Posted by LazyMcCrow

Reads to me like Yaropolk may have been a mafia killed by an SK. Not much in the thread to indicate who may look more innocent/guilty if that were the case. I've had a big problem with GeneralHankerchief's super-townie posts, but I don't know his playing style and that may just mean he IS a super townie. But anyway, the exchange with Atheotes after the first day indicates a high degree of confidence that he will get to the endgame. Nothing else tingling my spideys right now so vote: GeneralHankerchief

Then what about Csargo? 2 SKs killed two mafiosos? No whey, Mr. Ney.

GH is the godfather of Mafia in the Org.

And according to this pattern, someone should claim you are suspicious and vote you, and so on until we have a repeat of D1 and 2.

**Montmorency** · 03-03-2012, 20:05

Let me synposize the dilemma: our stated objectivecoming into this was to lynch the "purest" individual and please the gods.

On N1 there were no kills.

On N2, there were 3 kills, and 2 of them were written in a very unusual manner.

In each of these kills, the killer was written in a way that almost makes it seem like the same guy did the killing.

Despite the sudden onset of kills, our stated objective has not changed.

...

Have we learned nothing from Pizza's game? Things are not as they appear.

A note: in the previous large game (Buffy 2) there was a mafioso who could kill 3 players a night. Just saying.

**Ishmael** · 03-03-2012, 20:28

I actually agree with Lazy here - GH is seeming a bit too friendly and helpful a townie, more so than in the (admittedly few) other games I've played with him. I'm not sold on edse, who I think was just making a regular groundless day 1 lynch, and so for want of anyone better:

vote: General Hankerchief

**Montmorency** · 03-03-2012, 20:43

What I'm trying to get across: Who are we lynching, and for what?

I get the feeling we're all just here to die.

It's a trap! We're all to be sacrificed!

**Ishmael** · 03-03-2012, 20:50

Hmm, you have a point Montmorency - we're trying to lynch the person with the 'pure soul,' but I have no idea how the mafia/serial killer fits into that. It could conceivably be that the pure person is a one-man mafia team, with multiple kills and whatnot, but it seems a bit unbalanced if the town can win with a single lucky lynch.

**White_eyes:D** · 03-04-2012, 01:01

Originally Posted by Ishmael

Hmm, you have a point Montmorency - we're trying to lynch the person with the 'pure soul,' but I have no idea how the mafia/serial killer fits into that. It could conceivably be that the pure person is a one-man mafia team, with multiple kills and whatnot, but it seems a bit unbalanced if the town can win with a single lucky lynch.

Some of Khaan's games only featured 2 mafia in a game of thirty. There even was one where they had to lynch each other and recruit a new scum-buddy who didn't really count and the main mafia could still be lynched and lose. I wouldn't rule out the "one man mafia team" theory but it is a bit of a stretch. Need more people to start posting votes here.

Vote:Csargo